there are also extensions for vscode that do this, vim plugins, etc
986 karma · joined September 4, 2021
there are also extensions for vscode that do this, vim plugins, etc
No, they don't, see laws that make negligent behavior illegal
"Cambridge Analytica then arranged an informed consent process for research in which several hundred thousand Facebook users would agree to complete a survey for payment that was only for academic use.[15][17] However, Facebook allowed this app not only to collect personal information from survey respondents but also from respondents' Facebook friends.[15] In this way, Cambridge Analytica acquired data from millions of Facebook users.[15]"
CA acquired access to the data of ~90 million users from the actions of several thousand other users whom they paid to fill out forms that stated they were for non-political use.
FB said data was private that they then shared with CA without user consent.
This was widely reported on, and people admitted to these behaviors. I am not sure an internal email is enough to rewrite history.
> If you read either my comment or the email, you'd know what the advice was.
I read both of these, and many of your recent comments seem to be some form of directed motivated reasoning or trolling, not sure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook%E2%80%93Cambridge_Ana...
If that was the advice, it seems pretty terrible.
what the fuck do you know about what i have read?
i was responding to a statement from the article. the link i shared is to an article that i read. it is cited some 600 times by similar articles.
i don't have the time to analyze every thing that the president or his administration posts. i don't know the realness of the AI faces he posts. if you have a resource that summarizes this, feel free to share.
maybe try to add to a discussion instead of ridiculing those participating in it with anecdotes and accusations.
https://www.aviatorgear.com/p-52057-laredo-sector-tech-ops-p...
there is some very depressing research on this topic
No?
why?
seems like, eventually (mostly) no one cares
any cognitive science textbook will bring some thoughts, or a cursory google scholar search
no information is so important to violate others' right to their own property.
so i contribute as little as possible, in the name of "community", per the guidelines.
a great harm in human society is overconfident extrapolation, especially when treating humans as analogous to weather elements
however, there is literature that explores this aspect, but not relative to what we know right now (and if it is a global trait, does it matter at the general population level?)
that first paper is on academic outcomes in uraguay, with a particular set of testing that i am not familiar with. if you could fill me in, that would be great.
i am also not following how they arrived at this:
'We find no statistically significant effect of FTTH exposure on children spending more than one hour per day in front of a screen – the threshold recommended by health institutions – nor on caregivers' acceptance of using screens to entertain children without supervision. We interpret this as insufficient evidence to confirm the direct channel with our data, rather than as evidence that it is not operating: our measures of screen time have significant limitations, and we cannot rule out that direct exposure is also playing a role.'
but i can't see the whole paper from where i am at the moment.
the other paper looks more like a magazine article, but i will try to take a look at it.
When? Which decade between 1970 and today?
Show me the study or tell me the keywords to look up, because I cannot reveal what you are hinting at.
this is about banning existing technology for material in teaching.
> We have tonnes of evidence in kids with versus without devices
that is a blanket statement, wrt to device time (i assume without you specifying), and is not what is being discussed in this article, and more of the fear mongering that leads to these outcomes
also, LLMs are great at summarizing knowledge, which is likely a better fit for earlier stages of education, rather than later forms, to instill some sense of interest.
are students actually having issues discerning real people from LLMs in NYC? did they explore that before coming up with this program or is this signaling? the article is scant on these details, which is unfortunate.
"The new mandate also includes restrictions on the use of individual laptops and tablets. Students in preschool through second grade will no longer be able to use individual devices at all, while older elementary school students will face time limits of 30 to 45 minutes a day. But exceptions will reportedly be made for students who are actively learning English or are living with disabilities, as well as for the use of coding software."
without citing evidence that does anything at all, that comes across as luddite levels of hope that putting kids in information jail will do something special that'll make them "better" somehow.
pretty much anyone on this forum who is older than 30 should remember these dumb jails that did nothing but frustrate students when they attempted to get access to information.
i was writing "code" when i was in 4th grade >30 years ago, and if i had these restrictions in school, relative to what exists today, i wouldn't have been.
you cannot fight the future this way.
https://electionlab.mit.edu/research/voting-mail-and-absente...
more controversy:
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/25/us/mail-in-voting-states....
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/31/us/politics/postal-servic...
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/02/us/politics/postal-servic...