(Yes, I am aware of the otherwise nonsensical concepts "pattern" and "interesting".)
3,876 karma · joined December 20, 2011
(Yes, I am aware of the otherwise nonsensical concepts "pattern" and "interesting".)
The health benefits of exercise are most likely due to improved blood flow and related physiological effects. In principle, pills could theoretically achieve similar outcomes by enhancing circulation or other underlying mechanisms.
Not taking sides here, just reasoning out loud.
Note that you'd also have to be somewhat more precise as to what the "state" and "next state" are. It is likely that the state is everything that enters the brain (i.e. by means of sensing, such as what we see, hear, feel, introspect, etc.). However, parts of this state enter the brain at various places and at various frequencies. Abstracting that all away might be problematic.
https://www.pantone.com/articles/fashion-color-trend-report/...
Or am I completely misunderstanding how Claude Code works?
Importance is a local concept, and it can be quite relevant locally.
[1] https://www.thoughtworks.com/radar/techniques/high-performan...
[2] https://www.thoughtworks.com/radar/techniques/big-data-envy
Please read my sibling comment where I expand a bit on what I meant to say.
> TUNES started in 1992-95 as an operating system project, but was never clearly defined, and it succumbed to design-by-committee syndrome and gradually failed. Compared to typical OS projects it had very ambitious goals, which you may find interesting.
As for whether that expectation is "selfish" on my part, I think that question has been debated for centuries in ethics, and I'm quite comfortable landing on the side that says not all disapproval is self-interest. In my own case, I'm not benefiting much either :)
Please do judge them for being parasitical. They might seem successful by certain measures, like the amount of money they make, but I for one simply dislike it when people only think about themselves.
As a society, we should be more cautious about narcissism and similar behaviors. Also, in the long run, this kind of behaviour makes them an annoying person at parties.
The important thing for it to succeed was to have a large enough group of people using the same standards. That was probably a (very) hard thing to accomplish, and perhaps Berners-Lee played a large role in that?
It's just that silly ideas get to live around for a long time, and simply proving them false has little to no effect.