skinfaxi

I wonder if the same was once said about calculating machines and calculators.

Ah so you were just trolling.

Is not some regulation necessary? Spectrum is limited. You seem to have thought a lot about this so curious about your perspective.

> but I am pretty partial to direct ownership of a percentage.

What does that look like in practice?

You can decline but then they can seize is that right?

Your belief is misplaced and incorrect.

I went to give it a try but it's a hosted SaaS and no privacy policy or anything?

So someone who was previously unknown brought all this attention on themselves while being a coy billionaire? We live in strange times so it's possible but doubtful.

> Cost of litigation should be proportional to a reasonable settlement.

What do you mean by this?

You missed my point. Is it easier to discover a novel exploit than it is to build software that is exploitable?

> Whenever I’ve seen AI researchers talk about the possibility of AI writing fiction they always sound very confused about why people read novels.

Why do people read novels? For the story or something else?

Is it easier to discover a vulnerability than to introduce one?

What's that second line of business?

> These are effectively the next OS.

What do you mean by that? In what way?

So what's the allowed level of voter fraud we should accept? And the fact check is about votes not registered voters. Funny how it focuses on national elections when local elections can be swayed by handfuls of votes.

Didn't it recently come to light of NJ registering thousands of non-citizens to vote?

I like this way of branching and adding context for the user. It would be interesting to make it more generalizable to other texts.

I used to think like this. People were having kids while bombs were falling around them, I think we can manage.

How do you coordinate across all of your devices?

Many schools have done away with textbooks and kids use chromebooks.

Is that what happened with Huggingface? Didn't they disable guardrails?

Courts navigate this fine line already even for their own courtrooms. There are restrictions on rights like time/place restrictions, for instance.

People can take your life from you, do you not have the right to live?

> Federal gas taxes don't count, because those go to the Highway Trust Fund which funds road construction, which is not an operating expense.

Doesn't the Highway Trust Fund pay for road maintenance as well?

Am interested but don't want to sign up for discord to try something out.

Nerds with grandmas can manage grandma's DNS or better yet set up MDM (I'm serious).

I've had a similar experience, also at a very large organization. In my case this person chose that kind of environment because it allowed them to work on side stuff while waiting for approvals, etc. A lot of people in very large companies don't view the grind of organizational friction inhibiting their actions as problematic.

> Should it be fully agentic? Should there be human intervention here to approve the CAPA? Open questions to be answered.

I think a point we are grappling with is, what necessitates human intervention, like philosophically. Is it accountability? I was thinking about this in terms of code review and it's not like we would fire someone if they broke prod, so at what point do we need someone accountable. Maybe it's for approvals for certain classes of risk (like those associated with actual harm to life). It's also not lost on me that many human systems lack accountability.

Why don't you think people should use your implementation? Just curious

I know what a gate is for. My question was trying to get you to explain the middle ground between the extremes. That it is hard to visualize/imagine is kind of my point. The UAC prompt is an excellent example of a potential middle ground that is definitely a gate but a near useless one.