For the bike use-case OsmAnd might be better, as other replies in this HN entry suggest.
281 karma · joined January 2, 2014
TBH, I doubt it. Don't get me wrong, I sympathize with your values. Heck, I'm even called 'woke' by most people around me. Yet I understand that in this day in age, thanks to cryptocurrency, money is and will be a private matter. No government will be able to confiscate your wealth, at least to the extent that your wealth doesn't depend on assets related with the government (e.g. real estate is related given that you need to pay taxes to maintain it).
Especially if the brainwallet adds a salt, which is maybe the problem that the previous poster was referring to. Brainwallets that don't add a salt are definitely a risk.
But less chances that they both ban you roughly at the same time. So if A bans you, you move to B and start integrating C. Once you have integration with C ready, you then support B&C in production.
If in the future B or C ban you, then do same as above with D.
BTW, what would be your first choice for a $StripeAlternative nowadays?
IMO the token might be an illegal security indeed; and if that's the case I hope the SEC crushes them. But in the meantime I'll be using ENS names happily as a user and watch the events with popcorn.
> but I don't see how crypto domain names are any different or changes anything.
It will prevent that a big corp with the court on their side redirect your domain-bought-in-a-complete-legit way to them.