I’m not going to paraphrase because the threads were erased. I don’t have most of the comments actually.
Mail me at my username at duck.com and I’ll send you the handles of the account, you can search GitHub yourself.
298 karma · joined January 17, 2016
I’m not going to paraphrase because the threads were erased. I don’t have most of the comments actually.
Mail me at my username at duck.com and I’ll send you the handles of the account, you can search GitHub yourself.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33577471
They were not offensive, they were not disrespectful, they were actually valid complaints, and I also used to participate a lot, and since people echoed the comments, they were considered ‘disruptive’.
```
Your accounts were disabled following reports that its content or activity may have been in violation of the following prohibition found in our Acceptable Use Policies:
"We do not allow content or activity on GitHub that:
is off-topic, or interacts with platform features in a way that significantly or repeatedly disrupts the experience of other users"
Specifically, the activity that was reported included posting repetitive and disruptive comments in Visual Studio repositories, which we found to be in violation of our Acceptable Use Policies.
```
Msft said it was a GitHub decision, they can’t interfere.
But in other countries, is more complicated than that.
In Brazil, those kinds of bans behaviors are not ok under consumer protection laws, and also their TOS where they don’t guarantee anything even for paid accounts is definitely not ok and suable for damages if something happens.
Work domain.
Work projects.
Browser fingerprinting.
Vscode telemetry data.
Windows telemetry data.
There are lots of ways to track it, and probably there’s a machine learning algorithm that helps it, because every time I find a loophole, when I’m suspended again the loophole stops working.
But the ban is forever, there is zero transparency, and no appeal.
I’m thinking of suing a distributor or the local Microsoft subsidiary.
Whether or not the comment warrants a permaban or not, I’d gladly delete it, avoid the behavior in the future, and also clearly regret it!
I believe this is the way forward. Existing packages are essentially tied to cpython because that’s what the python.org website offers for download, and people will just use that by default.
Once all major packages support the new c api, it will be easier to just use something other than cpython by default.
It’s incredible how even Julia’s Pkg.jl supports better python packaging in combination with conda than the official python packaging tools.
This is very clearly a question of the culture of the core python developers (such as brett cannon) who seem to think the machine learning people with their compilers and JITs are not an important part of the community.
What’s wrong with casting variables to mutate their type?
By the way, how are we on data-science friendly IDEs? Debugging? Automatic thorough documentation generator? Tooling in general? Is the time to first plot fast?
Where I work, we desperately need a fast python.
Perhaps then we’ll get something better than git.