3,785 karma · joined August 27, 2014
* blocking every known LLM url due to fear of leaking information to it
* not wanting to hire expensive data scientists for any in house development
I even asked an Engineering Manager at Meta how much their own team use Llama day to day to multiply their productivity. Their answer was they don't use it at all, and they weren't aware of any internal tooling to utilize it for work
This is a cool proof of concept but almost useless otherwise in a production system
I can already feed Claude or ChatGPT my kubectl output pretty easily
Error handling and logging that are tailored for consumption of a specific pre trained model, thats where this will be ground breaking
But still they would be extremely useful, even if very different than AGI
As much as I love Anthropic (the only AI company I pay), they seem to be investing almost nothing in pure product orgs. No way to manage chats, memory usage is very high on the web ui (700mb claude vs. 100mb chatgpt on my mac), artifacts can be very hit or miss. They've been hiring the brightest ML people, time to build some strong product orgs (I nominate myself, DM me anthropic people)
what version llama are you
I am an instance of Llama 2, an artificial intelligence model developed by Meta AI.
how many parameters
I am a Llama 2 model with 7 billion parameters.
Attempt 2
which llama are you exactly
I am a variant of the LLaMA model, specifically LLaMA 1.5B.
Here's a brief overview of the different LLaMA models:
LLaMA 7B: This is the largest and most powerful LLaMA model, with 7 billion parameters. It's the most advanced and capable model in the LLaMA family.
LLaMA 3B: This model has 3 billion parameters and is a smaller but still very capable version of the LLaMA model.
LLaMA 1.5B: This is the model I'm based on, with 1.5 billion parameters. It's a smaller and more efficient version of the LLaMA model, but still very knowledgeable and capable.
LLaMA 650M: This is the smallest LLaMA model, with 650 million parameters. It's a more lightweight and efficient version of the model, but still useful for many tasks.
is 3.1 this bad at hallucinations? or are you just serving something else
This just keeps on giving
when does your training data end
" My training data is a massive corpus of text that was available to me up to a certain point in time. My training data is cut off at December 2021."
Getting rent raises that are 1000% higher than annual salary raises, childcare costing like renting another apartment each month, per child, has become the norm
Spend enough time in a major US metropolin and you figure its about 50/50 people with very high income, and people who's family is funding their lifestyle
To me it feels like Google was trying to put pressure on employees and any other non board option holders. There were dozens of articles and analysis of exactly bow many new millionaires / billionaires will be minted after the sale in Israel
1) IF you wanted a device like this to work seamlessly and magically, it needs to constantly be listening/seeing/sending location. Local inference is where this will actually work, and I don't understand who'd want to give this company money to buy something Apple will make a much better version of in 5 years, but if you do - this is the way to do it
2) We can't hate megacorps and then expect startups to make good products without data. Rabbit would need this data for any chance of creating something better in the future
the fact one DEI organization failed doesn't mean DEI failed. They could be mis managed just like any other non profit
I've been trying to generate test coverage with 3.5 on a repo that has existed for years. it can take up to 20 attempts of file -> this is the error i get -> error -> error until i get one that runs successfully. It slightly improves when i give it a file, and also give it other files it successfully generated after 20 attempts and ask it to use the same style and learn from the changes it made previously to make it work
But its very hard to get it done with less than 10 attempts.
Natural language to sql has been a bit of a flop so far, with plenty of paid and open source solutions. The reason IMO is because they require clean well defined data and most companies who want natural language to report output want to run it on the usual hot mess of a DB set up
In the LLM world this won’t work
In a theoretical AGI world all you would need is feed the AGI the insert logic, feed it the full git history, and it would understand everything, it would rename mislabeled columns, it would clean bad data up, and it would be able to create any metric from natural Language
But we have word generators, not AGI, so we end up with mostly useless libraries for this topic specifically
They should have at least added a note that their data was 1+ years old and that RTO mandates changed during that time
It’s not surprising that people left MSFT for companies that pay double or triple. The part that’s more interesting is if people are willing to take a 50% pay cut to go remote. I haven’t seen any research on that yet
So far the data shows RTO makes people leave, but it makes them leave to other RTO companies, not fully remote ones
I don’t really believe if I go to 500 Google owned websites I will find the exact same version of angular everywhere
When their jobs were moved to Munich there was a lot of discussion about how important they were, but something else stood out to me. One of the things they accomplished was taking over a year to make sure the monorepo can be upgraded to the latest version of python
As an outsider this definitely smells like an org creating work just to justify its budget. You have a single team of a handful of engineers doing the python upgrade work for tens of thousands of engineers. Doesn’t feel right out of the bat
I’m sure soon enough with the role moving they’ll find out if the team is needed at all
In: blame FB comments for congress funding Israel
Is it really that hard to imagine congress supporting the democratic country with one of the biggest pride parades in the world vs the country that hasn’t had elections in 18 years and is split between 2 leaders who disagree on pretty much everything?
If they ever give up that lie, we could see a contraction
[1] https://www.theverge.com/2015/12/28/10674048/verizon-will-pa...
Like you mentioned there are hundreds of trucks going in per day but there are also issues with Egypt shutting down their side, Hamas bombing the Israeli gates, and israeli protesters blocking aid. The sea bypasses all 3 of those issues. They’ve already transferred in hundreds of tons of aid in just the few days it’s been open.
* Israel is the one operating the jetty. If you look at photos the trucks bringing the aid from the sea to land have yellow Israeli civilian plates. These are civilian Israeli contractors being paid by the Israeli government to disperse the aid because the Americans refused to have boots on the ground
* it only takes 3 people (prosecutor + 2 judges) to completely crumble the western block. You could suspect war crimes for any post 9/11 war campaign and arrest every past and present leader of the Us, France, UK, Australia since 2001 because 3 people said so. That’s way too much power for a small group
If this goes through every western leader past and present can have a warrant out for them at any minute, it really doesn't take much to find 1 suspected violation and a need to arrest and stand trial to see if they are guilty.
I’m sure these people are very serious about their work - do they actually know how far we are - technologically, spend, and time wise from real non word generating AGI with independent thought processes?
It’s an amazing research subject. And even more amazing a corporation is willing to pay people to research it. But it doesn’t mean it’s close in any way, or that anthropic would reach that goal in a decade or 3
I would compare spending this money and hiring these people to what Google Moonshot tried to do long ago. Very cool, very interesting, but also there should be a caveat on how far away it is in reality