shikon7

I'm still waiting for the youth simulation suit.

But along the same argument you may claim ownership, but it means nothing wrt copyright.

So you cannot stop them from using the code AI generated for you, based on copyright claims.

Shouldn't it be the other way round, linear to time, and logarithmic relative to (the exponentially growing) capital investment?

But surely there aren't thousands of new corpuses built every minute.

I wonder on what basis "someone who’s lived nearly seven decades without once setting foot in an airport lounge" is critisizing an op-ed about airport longes so harshly.

Also, using an OpenAI model to judge the performance of an OpenAI model seems prone to all kinds of biases.

Yes, the forward pass does a next token prediction on all input tokens (so we know exactly how many tokens from the small model matched). The expensive thing is not the computation, but the memory bandwidth, as each pass needs to load the model from memory.

If the small model predicts some tokens correctly, you save some passes, at the expense of doing some extra computations when the tokens were not correct.

In any case, each forward pass will give at least one new token.

In a some sense that goes back to the roots, as you can't distinguish these in German either ("Erde" is always capitalized)

What irony that this report might be the most read UN report

AI context and instruction following has become so good, probably you could put this verbatim in an AI prompt, and the AI would react according to the post.

The novel concept is to make it explicit where a non-concurrent scheduler is enough (async), and where it is not (async-concurrent). As a benefit, you can call async functions directly from a synchronous context, which is not possible for the usual async/await, therefore avoiding the need to have both sync and async versions of every function.

And with green threads, you can have a call chain from async to sync to async, and still allow the inner async function to yield through to the outer async function. This keeps the benefit of async system calls, even if the wrapping library only uses synchronous functions.

From what I understand, only the sensitive data needs to be encrypted (e.g. your bank transactions). It is still possible to use public unencryped data in the computation, as the function you want to compute doesn't have to be encrypted.

There is also &mut str. The nice thing about Rust is that the same memory area can be used as a "StringBuilder" with &mut str, and then as a "String" with &str. Once you have a &str reference, Rust statically guarantees that no one else cam mutate it.

You can, but allocating and deallocating is more tedious without a GC, and if you care about performance, you might want to have mutable strings.

Until someone makes the idea fashionable to replace HR with AI.

If you need to change trains, you will need to walk (or travel by non-train) some distance in all cases. I wonder, is there a limit to the transfer distance, so that it still counts as traveling by rail only?

If there is nobody left to observe when it stops decaying, will it ever stop decaying?

Don't forget about the startup that went from "Twitter" to "X" to "AI-powered X"

> illustrative 30-day calendar of exercises

That there is such a calendar for using ChatGPT in the style of topics like "how to eat healthy", "how to stay fit" or "how to be more confident" shows to me more than anything what impact AI has on our society.

> Sure they can copy paste the error into the LLM and hope for the best, but what happens when that doesn’t fix it?

Then you throw the code away and start newly from scratch. Or you accept that your problem cannot be solved by vibe coding.

Probably these things exist, but if they are truly unhypeable, only a select few will ever know of it, and their economic and societal impact will remain negligible.

The really smart people are those who figure out which part of the hype is real and which is exaggerated.

Combine an exponential growth in investments (that is inherent to our economy) with a logarithmic return in capabilities, and you get a linear increase in capabilities.

Only on sunday, for now it's only available in the USA

> An important note: We are enabling the Assistant for all users in phases, based on regions, starting with USA today. The full rollout for ‘Assistant for All’ is scheduled to be completed by Sunday, 23:59 UTC.

If its only use is to make injecton safety a bit easier to achieve, it's worth it to me.

I have no confidence at all. In fact, preventing further Russian aggression might not be Trump's goal to begin with. After all, Trump did say he would encourage Russia to invade a country that didn't pay its due.

What could Congress do? Make another law that might also be ignored?

As I read this, that executive order is only relevant if the DEI program would violate Federal anti-discrimination laws.

As I understand it, they add a new set of planets with the new features, and keeping the old planets untouched.

The increased variety is not because trillions of planets are added, but because the new planets will have more varierty than the old ones.

I wonder why it is so hard for Rust to implement its own safe stdlib independent of C.