[1] http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21571417-how-prevent-v...
592 karma · joined September 4, 2010
[1] http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21571417-how-prevent-v...
Responsiveness being : it takes too long to a) switch tabs b) open a new tab c) access a menu (e.g. File/Whatever). The UI might take a second or more to respond. I might have 50 tabs open spread over 5-6 windows.
Currently, the browser is running well and I suspect the most recent responsiveness trouble was caused by an add-on (Brief - feed reader) which I have disabled.
But I second the call for a better way to identify badly behaving tabs (CPU as well as RAM) more easily.
Firefox is a great browser and thanks to all who make it.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p003k9fs
"Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss Stoicism, the third great philosophy of the Ancient World."
Angie Hobbs is always worth hearing, as is this program. It's a reason to pay the license fee.
"Taxing times As newspapers’ woes grow, some are lobbying politicians to make Google pay for the news it publishes"
Not necessarily the end of the world (see Brasil) but might not have the intended consequences :
http://www.economist.com/news/international/21565928-newspap...
Right now, there's no concept of having page "administrators", so the person who creates the page is the only one who can post to it. Also, no transfer of "ownership". Both these things are "coming soon" apparently but make the whole experience a bit suboptimal right now.
Surely you're not saying KVM is bug free? Looks like it. That's almost certainly wrong.
This always makes me pause to wonder if there's a compelling reason I should "temporarily" disable NoScript (which often then cascades to more sites I need to "temporarily" unblock), or just walk away. I often do the latter.