254 karma · joined April 18, 2010
Normally, this is solved by using a CNAME record, but if you use a CNAME as the zone apex, then you cannot have any subdomains (because they will all be resolved through the CNAME record).
For some additional information: http://scripting.com/stories/2011/11/13/dnsimplesNewAliasFea... http://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/Cre...
*. RHEL 6.0 to CentOS 6.0: 242 Days
*. RHEL 6.1 to CentOS 6.1: 204 Days
*. RHEL 6.2 to CentOS 6.2: 14 Days
*. RHEL 6.3 to CentOS 6.3: 18 Days
*. RHEL 6.4 to CentOS 6.4: 15 Days
*. RHEL 6.5 to CentOS 6.5: 10 DaysLet's look at the apple transition from powerpc to intel chips. Geekbench has a reasonable number that we can look at to compare against, so let's use that. http://browser.primatelabs.com/mac-benchmarks
We can see that the one of the late 2005 Power Mac G5 had 2 2.3 Ghz cores. This garnered a score of 2088.
About a year later, a mac mini was on the market using an Intel chip. In this case, the Intel Core Duo T2300 which runs at 1.66 Mhz with 2 cores. This received a very similar score of 2128, even though it is running considerably slower.
Later on in the years, I can come up with a Mac Mini (Mid 2011) that has an I5 running at 2.3 Ghz (The same as the original PPC we're comparing to). However, this gets a score of 5818, more than double the original PPC I picked.
---
My only point here is that it is VERY difficult to use processor speed as a tool to compare processors. It's even difficult to use it to compare a Xeon vs an I5, even though they both use the same architecture and are made by the same company.
For example, clang or gcc (under -O1) will precompute all of the math in that for-loop, and the entire function just becomes the printf with a known value.
define i32 @main() nounwind uwtable ssp {
%1 = tail call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([6 x i8]* @.str, i64 0, i64 0), i64 500000000500000000) nounwind
ret i32 0
}In the US, most large grocery store offer a card that you can use which gives you various rewards, and in turn allows them to perform analytics on their customer base.
Historically, these rewards were related to coupons for products in the store. However, this means that there is no benefit to using your particular card instead of someone else's.
More recently, the grocery stores have added other bonuses. The one that I'm most familiar with is for fuel / petrol. They team up with some fuel brand, say exxon, and when you've purchased enough on your loyalty card, you get something like $0.05 of your per gallon fuel costs.
The scheme with the poster above breaks down, because you need the physical loyalty card to use the fuel discount, and it's unlikely that everyone is refueling their car an equal amount each week, and that everyone is purchasing an equivalent amount of product at the store each week.
The only PCIe expansion capability available on any mac (including the new mac pro) is thunderbolt. The new mac pro does not have any internal expansion.
You can however, use something like [this](http://www.sonnettech.com/product/echoexpresschassis.html), as long as you realize that you only have access to PCIe x4 bandwidth.
I've also not seen any posts of anyone actually doing this yet.
Here are the supported fields:
* Contact: name, tel, email
* Shipping: street-address, address-line1, address-line2, locality, region, country, postal-code
* Billing: street-address, address-line1, address-line2, locality, region, country, postal-code
* Payment: cc-name, cc-number, cc-exp, cc-csc, cc-type
But it doesn't jive with other images I've seen, where they had the man on the ground with guns pointed at him. So I'm doubting the veracity at this point.
Edit: It appears that the picture I saw was of someone who turned out to not be a suspect. Which would explain my confusion.
Normally, once the two sides pass relatively similar bills, a conference committee is formed to resolve any differences, and then that resulting legislation is voted on.
Whether or not this is actually hard for their codebase, I have no idea.