This article makes an important point: studies prove people in accidents have significantly reduced head damage. However, not many studies prove that it makes bicycling safer: instead, cyclers are perceived safer, and therefore it is unsafer.
917 karma · joined November 17, 2014
This article makes an important point: studies prove people in accidents have significantly reduced head damage. However, not many studies prove that it makes bicycling safer: instead, cyclers are perceived safer, and therefore it is unsafer.
But first (with great distance) on the list of failed Microsoft products is their accounts. Ever tried to login into msdn? Even our sysadmin who's is daily job is to get this right fails many times. The UX is so confusing and ambiguous, it's not funny. Everytime I need to deal with it I am seriously considering moving away from the whole MS ecosystem.
Very interesting. I live on the southern outskirts of The Hague, Netherlands. Between The Hague and De Nieuwe Waterweg is the Glass City [0] located, a large area (~20x20km) with mainly greenhouses. These greenhouses use artificial light to spur growth in plants, causing the white core in the light pollution heatmap.
When I look out on my balcony to the south, the sky never turns dark. Only when there is heavy rain clouds, the light from the greenhouses dims a bit. The sky is always in an orang-y darkish glow.
[0]: https://translate.google.nl/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&pre... (translated dutch wiki page, english page is only stub)
I should emphasize that the 40 hours should be spend well and the employee should use enough time for relaxation, rest and leasure. 40 hours for e.g. a head of family in busy waters may quickly be detrimental.
So instead of sub-40 hour work weeks, we should maybe introduce partial yearly roles. So for example if you want to do 30 hours per week, simply work 3/4 weeks per year (39 of 52), but do work these weeks 40h.
Further, it seems to me the thermal expansion problem (to me the single biggest technical problem) is not an issue either.
No wonder Elon Musk started The Boring Company. Once costs go significantly down to bore tunnels, most land on earth can be used to build a highspeed network on.
Slower roads (max 20MPH/30KMPH) should be bicycle and pedestrian-first. Cars there should be "guests" catering to the slower non-motorized traffic.
This way we have the best of both worlds: nice & livable urban roads and faster driving in connecting roads.
1. Roundabouts are safer and better with human drivers but bad from a usability standpoint. It's annoying to drive, slower, and makes people feel nauseous when driving through many. When we have road usage of autonomous vehicles surpassing 50%, I suggest to remove them.
2. Two-Leveled intersections without left turns seem cost effective and highly advantageous in cities. To lower the cost even further, it may be possible to design them for vehicles only (much lower ceilings needed, so much lower cost). Left turns can be achieved (especially in the US this is viable) bu going right three times (going around the block). Two-leveled intersections without left turns can reach 100% capacity in all lanes from all directions.
3. Lane-specific traffic light already may increase efficiency on intersections. Imagine a 2x2 intersection from both directions: the right turns can be green (where cars turn right on the rightmost lane) while through-traffic can use the left lane.
No, if anything, UK roads are specifically not designed to handle bicycle traffic. I wonder what makes you think so?
How is Tesla's supposed claim they solved electrical driving misleading?
No, it is not a good solution to the problem; you ignore my earlier comments. English or latin text is not comprised of the sole ASCII characterset; it contains characters outside this set (quoting other languages, names, imported words for example).
* RegEx is not very readable
* RegEx can be (very) slow
* It's not trivial to write RegEx code that achieves your goal in a high-quality way. Often quircks and edge-cases are missed.
I'm not saying that you should never use them, but oftentimes a (much) better alternative of achieving your goals is present.
See https://blog.codinghorror.com/regular-expressions-now-you-ha...