55 karma · joined November 21, 2013
http://www.quora.com/What-are-some-good-books-or-classes-abo...
I bet the book will be even better since it is revised by Peter himself. I can't wait to read it as well.
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/discoveries-projects/Rev...
It makes sense that robots should learn similar to how humans learn, by analyzing data from many trials and then adjusting the method used to achieve the goal. Instead of manually trying to think of the algorithm. It seems like all AI should be done this way, by learning.
One problem is that many people don't have bitcoin even if it is the best way to pay. Many people are uncomfortable buying bitcoins.
Amazon micropayment service lets you pay with credit card transaction anywhere from $0.05 to $9.99 with a 5% + .05 cent transaction fee. Which isn't as good as bitcoin but it is still pretty good as far as credit card fees go.
https://payments.amazon.com/help/Amazon-Flexible-Payments-Se...
Many small micro-payments can really add up. This can be huge for content creators. I would really like to give tips to people who create educational science videos, open source software, open source hardware, write detailed tutorials for hardware and software projects, take the time to help me on forums, etc. Many content creators on the internet have helped me. I might not want to give a lot to each but I can give a small tip. Which can still make a difference to the creator if many people also do the same.
I think if they charged a fee for the tip it would be a more standard business model and people would not find it as exciting. It seems more direct to customer this way without the man in the middle dilemma for content creators. Also charging a fee in addition to the transaction fee would make it increasingly difficult to tip the creator a small amount. I think the fact they don't charge a fee on top of the transaction fee is out of necessity.
Is this the same camera?
I was hoping to really lower the barrier to donating by only asking for a .10 - .20 cent donation per person, per month. I think many more people would be willing to donate .10 - .20 cents per month instead of $6.00 per month.
.10 - .20 cents a month would not be a noticeable difference to most people, so people would sign up without any concern about their own finances. As long as they could trust the payment options and donation service.
Lets take a look at a possible scenario here. Currently amazon micropayments charges credit cards 5% of transaction value + $0.05 for transactions anywhere between $.05 - $9.99.
Lets consider single transactions between .10 - .20 cents. Any transaction in this range comes with a 6 cent transaction fee. So you would receive a net payment of .04 - .14 cents per person per month.
Imagine an example where each person donates .20 cents and we receive .14 cents net per person after transaction fee. How many user do we need to get $500,000? About 3.57 million users.
Seems like a lot of people but it is only about .01% of the United States population. And since the website could take donations from anyone in the world willing to give .20 cents a month, I think attaining practical large sums would be achievable. And extremely affordable!
So .25 cents a day is good if you can afford it, but .20 cents a month is soo extremely affordable for most people and with scale it could add up to a lot!