219 karma · joined August 23, 2016
Abrahimic deity-view will find it bizarre and difficult to understand.
edit: grammatical
What you may be complaining about is why is it illegal to contempt Indian Judiciary —- which is a different topic.
Muslim invaders eliminated them forever from India. Read this section: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Buddhists#Perse...
Of-course there were struggles with others before that, such as Brahmins, but those were political struggles, not existential. Many times Buddhists gained the favor of Kings, other times Brahmins.
> The main problem here is that it's not even in the mainstream public discourse cause the narrative is always set by the upper castes.
mainstream public discourse is set by whoever can set it, it is free for all. In my understanding it is generally the left leaning literate class, talking for suppressed classes. True, most of them have descended from upper-caste, but have since devowed their caste and have become caste-agnostic.
> This won't stop unless caste is uprooted from the society.
Caste is largely getting uprooted from society, I don't see this bringing social equality. In truth, now there is a upper-caste among lower-case -- the early beneficiaries of the reservation with whom others in the lower caste can't compete.
None of these examples are of aggression. Goa and 'Dadar and Nagar Haveli' were Portuguese occupied territories (much like rest of India was a British territory before independence). India got independence from Britain, but the Portuguese territories remained occupied.
Watch this interview (video) of an Indian officer (Mr. kaul) from during the time of Liberation of Goa to get some perspective: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRWTzp3RlJk
Not true. In-fact just the opposite. India started non-aligned movement and tried to remain non-aligned to the extent possible. Pakistan joined SEATO in 1954[1], India-Russia relations started a year later in 1955[2]
Also, India was not born Socialist, although it may have socialist policies - much like any other country. First mention of socialism was in 1976 [3]
> You are mistaken. India has been an aggressor as much as a victim.
I think you could easily have add examples to support your claim rather than making statements
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeast_Asia_Treaty_Organiza...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%E2%80%93Russia_relations...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_socialist_states#Curre...
Check out this list of books banned in India and tell me how many are from Modi Kaka's New India: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_books_banned_in_India
As far as Kitabi Kida goes - to my understanding, it is used for those who spent inordinate amount of time with books - not necessarily a insult for being smart. I think there's a subtle distinction here too.
Can there be process that can be guaranteed "unhackable". The paper based Ballot Box election in India were subjected to an even higher degree of reported rigging/hack then EVMs.
BTW this has been tried before: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenue_Act_of_1942
It was then, that the employers started giving free insurance to get around wage cap, and seedlings for present healthcare mess were planted.
https://www.ebri.org/publications/facts/index.cfm?fa=0302fac...
note: I have not read the article.
"if I'm a father with no opportunity" suffices.
Hot-wiring required physical accesss and breaking one car at a time, here one bug can effect all cars. Fat-tails?