One downside of workstation machines is that everything seems to be custom, even mundane things like fan connectors. See https://michael.stapelberg.ch/posts/2021-08-28-silent-hp-z44... for my experience with swapping the fans against quieter models.
5,258 karma · joined July 12, 2011
One downside of workstation machines is that everything seems to be custom, even mundane things like fan connectors. See https://michael.stapelberg.ch/posts/2021-08-28-silent-hp-z44... for my experience with swapping the fans against quieter models.
In practice, as you suspected, this amounts to AES, as per the curl -v output:
SSL connection using TLSv1.3 / TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
My theory is that you only have a limited time window per TCP packet, and decrypting TLS exceeds that time window. I haven’t verified that theory yet, though.
For comparison: init7 POPs used to be connected with 10 Gbit/s “only”, so even 10 people maxing out their Gigabit line would saturate the uplink. This turned out to never be a problem over the years, I would always get maximum speed. The average usage is very low, in part also because transfers complete so quickly.
You’re right about the lack of a C runtime being intentional. However, C programs can be run if you take on the task of keeping them up-to-date: https://gokrazy.org/prototyping/
Regarding WiFi, we have https://github.com/gokrazy/wifi which currently only works for unencrypted WiFi. If at some point there is a Go solution to configure encrypted WiFi, I’m all for it!
I do have a newer GPU, but it’s in my gaming PC. Using the previous-gen gaming PC in my desktop PC makes sense for me.
For my own purchases, I do buy PC components with Noctua fans as suggested :)
The specific 25G optic is https://www.flexoptix.net/en/p-b1625g-10-ad.html?co10426=972... and indeed does not support FEC.
The remote end is a Cisco C9500-48Y4C, on which one can turn off FEC.
On the Intel side, I found https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents..., which mentions that while No-FEC might result in “poor link quality” (sure, that’s why people use FEC), it does not say anything about degraded mode or limits to 10G.
By controller datasheet, I take it you’re referring to https://www.mouser.cn/datasheet/2/612/710_series_datasheet_v...
That document contains a state machine diagram listing 25G AUI‐RS, 25G AUI‐FC and 25G AUI‐N (in order) before the fallback to 10G SFI.
Did you misread or am I missing something?
In either case, I’ll try the card. If it won’t link at 25G, I can get a different one. Any recommendations? :)
He makes the calculation that from the ≈3000 CHF needed to connect a location with fiber, only 50 CHF difference come down to PON or AON. The advantage of dedicated lines (for all ISPs, too!) overweighs the financial savings in his reasoning.
https://github.com/stapelberg/zkj-nas-tools/blob/master/wolg...
The advantage over just catching any packets is that an SSH connection is authorized, so less noisy in terms of undesired wakeups.
Where can I read more about FEC (forward error correction?) and how that affects link speeds?
https://michael.stapelberg.ch/posts/2020-08-09-fiber-link-ho...
https://michael.stapelberg.ch/posts/2021-05-16-home-network-...