sebastianconcpt

Honest take: different surface, same category.

Reminds me of 2013 when I organized a TEDx, gosh so much work for absolute zero return. Also risk, what was I thinking?

Claude: give me all the schematics and operations manual of a production grade starship that can travel faster than light. Make no mistekaes.

Is a good thing depending on which ones. And our taste on what to specialize our judgment into varies a lot. One thing I do use as criteria to detect it can be a problem is in lack of understanding and lack of control of the layers that are part of verifications and diagnosing power.

The issue is not the issue, the issue is what their "solution" enables for expanding the surface that governments have for controlling details of how you live your life in the future once accepted.

You're right, I meant the Commissioners which are the ones essentially designing how to legislate, which is the traditional name for "engineer society behavior"

I share your concern but the generalization is improper (that as solution would be infinitely far worst than the problem)

This is the way.

Adding the reminder that these votes and majority rejecting are of unelected bureaucrats, so the way that it was framed was approved from above while making practically impossible to reject but still theoretically possible so people are forced to swallow it.

Soviet Union 2.0

Yeah, I realized this around may 2024 and started to rail models in deterministic workflows and tooling. LLMs are the new CPU.

The article is a piece of revolutionary rant.

> Capitalism is unnatural, and selects for unnatural things.

Wrong. Even plants have a conspicuous signaling economy to get their way to selection.

That framing is setting the question so you immediately are forced to compare pears to apples.

Of course 98% of sterilization is not enough for surgery or for precision in calculating your account balance but the category of landing page conversion a 98% would be astronomically high.

Another day in Everything is About Mate Suppression

You are mixing legalism with reality. All babies (and more) are accountable to physics.

I was waiting for the plot twist and it didn't come, so its genre is: horror.

I find your suggestion to equate a baby to AI brutally uncanny

The problem is that you have creations that aren't really obvious. Have you seen that rocket engine with a crazy laborious design made with an AI?

Isn't patenting an action to protect a benefit (whichever patent or benefit would be)?

Sanity! No AI has accountability so also should not own any benefits (not only patent but anything beneficial). Violate that and you created a blackhole of value creation.

  Location: Brazil
  Remote: Yes
  Willing to relocate: depends
  Technologies: Rust first choice but open. Background in full-stack, Smalltalk, JavaScript, Swift, Go, Python, bits of Ruby
  Résumé/CV: http://sebastiansastre.co/cv
  Email: find it in https://github.com/sebastianconcept

Software Engineer · Backend & Distributed Systems · Rust · Remote from Brazil. Experienced in high load high availability and high compliance requirement systems.

And we're heading to giving better quality feedback loops to AI models than people. Put this together with ignorance being the mother of evil and...

How good this can become?

Not sure if I'm alone in the feeling that we are going to desire AI more than like it.

Seeing running software as an asset is the right approach.

But the costs of executing and even re-doing things went significantly down.

The costs that didn't went down are the ones of breaking the chain of trust to a predictable outcome. A specific version of some running software accumulated trust. If you rewrite it from scratch that capital is reset on release.

Oh the self-contradiction here...

Generalizing this in the abstract is a wrong abstraction.

Politicians don't come from outer space, they emerge locally and were raised swimming in an imaginary that has normalized the morals that eventually end up expressed at the top.

Pretty happy with oMLX running Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-8bit

Better than Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-8bit ?

When I tried glm found it way way slower (omlx as runtime)

I've made a harness to discipline it and get consistent output regardless of model. Using it daily. Is the opposite of vibe coding, it delivers great planed code with my engineering taste. I had it open sourced for a while then I've closed it. Just a month or two after closing it, I read an article about this "clean room" thing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean-room_design

  Location: Brazil
  Remote: Yes
  Willing to relocate: depends
  Technologies: Rust first choice but open. Background in full-stack, Smalltalk, JavaScript, Swift, bits of Ruby
  Résumé/CV: http://sebastiansastre.co/cv
  Email: find it in https://github.com/sebastianconcept

Software Engineer · Backend & Distributed Systems · Rust · Remote from Brazil. Experienced in high load high availability and high compliance requirement systems.

My dad had that lettering kit! Even look like exactly that model and typography.