2,562 karma · joined September 2, 2019
Adjective
gross: brut, grossier, flagrant, choquant, fruste, bouffi
crude: brut, vulgaire, grossier, cru, simple, sec
raw: brut, cru, pur, écru, âpre, novice
unrefined: non raffiné, brut
dry: sec, aride, séché, brut, tari, caustique
rude: grossier, rude, impoli, mal élevé, brut, brusque
Noun
crude: brut
plug-ugly: dur, brut
https://translate.google.com/?sl=fr&tl=en&text=brut&op=trans...
Seems like the simplest counterpoint would be to demonstrate a M1 mac transmitting at the full data rate using a different cable.
> Cables used included a certified Thunderbolt 4 model, and the USB-C (data) cables provided with the cases. Again, each was verified by establishing SuperSpeed+ 10 Gb/s connections to an Intel Mac.
The drivers could also agree amongst themselves as to matters such as working conditions and minimum pay.
Uber and others could still exist, but they'd be at a disadvantage because they'd be ploughing billions into nonsense like self-driving blimps or whatever.
https://support.apple.com/en-gb/guide/apple-configurator-mac...
So it appears that you are the one that is missing something.
CRISPR-Cas9 (the method used here) was first successfully used seven years ago. According to the article, the meat may go to market in two years pending a safety review. So that's nine years from lab to table. How soon is too soon? What makes you think doing it now would be premature as opposed to ten years from now?
> It was to be measured and wary of bare professional and institutional assurances.
From where would you like to get assurances? Do you have to conduct the study yourself?
> Regarding the characteristics of plants and animals that we should feed to our children and mass rear in our environment - I am of the mind that the characteristics should be as well evidenced by the long history of life as we can afford.
That's all well and good till climate change reduces arable land and we have to extract as much as we can from the remainder.
What evidence do you have that our understanding of CRISPR and genetic modification today is on par of our understanding of CFCs and CJD in the 20th century?
It's like saying that we shouldn't release any new drugs because of the thalidomide catastrophe.
Is there a source to indicate that in the specific incident being covered by this article, that there is any evidence beyond the video itself?
I feel like people just want to believe. But this is a pretty satisfying explanation.
Much of its industrial policy actually resembles that of democratic states like Korea and Japan.
I'd argue China's experience presents a great argument for a mixed market economy that allows state intervention, while also recognising the importance of markets and decentralised economic coordination.
However, we shouldn't overhype China's progress. The fact of the matter is that China was always destined to become an economic juggernaut given its population size, stability, and resources.
It's just China had been tied down by Mao and his supporters managed to hijack the government for several decades and hindered China's ascent with their whacky policies. We're now seeing it snap back to where it belongs.
> echo '{"name": "Tom"}' | dasel -p json '.name'
https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/workspace/delivering-...
They also feature a table in a little GIF they have on that page.
https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/origin...