16,407 karma · joined January 19, 2011
Mandating full disk encryption is easy for IT to enforce. A policy of not putting sensitive information on laptops is valuable, but difficult to enforce. Encryption is a sound way to reduce the risk of harm when that policy is inevitably broken.
Full disk encryption also been the company-wide policy of everywhere I've worked in recent memory, fwiw.
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2019/11/21/state-of-mozilla-20...
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2019/11/21/state-of-mozilla-20...
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2018/11/27/state-of-mozilla-20...
In the 2+ years I've been at Mozilla, I think there's been almost complete turnover at the C-level.
For example, Chris Beard was CEO of Mozilla from 2014 through late 2019.
There's a frequent sentiment in these comment threads that Mozilla leadership is failing and facing no professional consequences, but I think that sentiment is misplaced.
"Hi friends, Firefox Developer Tools will not be going away. We will be a smaller team and will share more details later when we have them."
Let's take three others that make well-known desktop browsers: https://www.levels.fyi/?compare=Apple,Google,Microsoft&track...
According to that data, senior developers at Apple (ICT4), Google (L5) and Microsoft (64) make on average $320k, $352k, and $225k. Their fully-loaded costs (benefits, payroll taxes, office space, etc) to the company will of course be even higher.
These are examples of peer companies Mozilla is competing against for employees. As I explained at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24138083 , Mozilla does not try to attract people solely via compensation. However, you can only offer so much less before you're no longer able to hire and retain the talent you need.
Second, instead of stock you'll get a higher potential bonus. The bonus percentage increases based on your level.
Third, benefits are generous. Being able to work remotely was a particularly unique and valuable one for a long time.
Fourth, the class and scale of the problems Mozilla is solving are interesting and challenging, which is a motivation for some employees.
Fifth, the mission and the commitment to open source are a motivation to many employees as well.
(These are just my personal observations as a current employee)
That extension is described as:
"Prevent Facebook from tracking you around the web. The Facebook Container extension for Firefox helps you take control and isolate your web activity from Facebook."
Then there are all the non-engineering functions like HR, marketing, etc.
Mozilla has to do all of that.
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2019/08/29/thank-you-chris/
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2020/04/08/mitchell-baker-name...
Mozilla is very engineering-heavy. While I don't know other people's salaries, I do know that the fully loaded cost of a developer almost anywhere is much higher than $100k/yr.
This is on top of the 70 laid off in January (discussion of that at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22057737)
FWIW that's really not normal. Sounds like I got my pixel 3a around the same time as you, and I haven't had any problems like that. I wonder if you have a hardware defect of some sort.
> Coupled with Google's terrible implementation of work accounts
What's special about work accounts? I added both my personal and work Google accounts without any issues and can see events from both in my calendar, switch between them in google drive, etc.
https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/2020/07/new-relic-...
https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/opentelemetry-instrumentation...
What has changed is that Fenix uses Gecko via https://mozilla.github.io/geckoview/
`DELETE FROM "foo" WHERE time >= now() - 2d AND time < now() - 1d`
Also, of course their salary is relevant. The cost of an engineer's time is an important factor to consider when making build vs buy decisions. Usually it's one that argues in favor of "buy", but not always.
You'll also experience their habit of launching new features, waiting a while for customers to adopt them, then starting to charge extra for them.
Don't get me wrong, Datadog has great products. But they're also great at extracting money from their customers.
Both telegraf and collectd are mature programs with a large base of well-documented plugins. However, telegraf development is more active, and I find its golang codebase much more approachable than the C codebase of collectd. Obviously, YMMV.
In general though, I wouldn't advise adopting the entire TICK stack. Chronograf is inferior to Grafana. Kapacitor has a super-steep learning curve and is being deprecated by InfluxData. TIG (telegraf, influxdb, grafana) can be a good choice. Prometheus plus Grafana is worth evaluating as well; there's arguably more momentum in that ecosystem than in InflxuDB's.