sceptic123

That isn't going to be very helpful is it?

> can you build a website to promote the app

> can you add a page showing off the winamp mode

Looks good, but ran into loading spinners fairly quickly, large playlists kill this, I suspect because the api is not properly respecting the cache headers and is refetching the same information repeatedly and thus getting rate limited. Also

Once that happened I wasn't then sure if issues I'm seeing are from api or the app itself. It's possible this is prioritising the responsiveness of the UI rather than the actual speed of user interactions.

Also the menu bar icon doesn't work for me (on MacOs). I can see it, but it doesn't do anything and there's nothing in the app itself to enable/disable it (though thankfully it does respect cmd+drag to delete).

Teams was never great to start with

We've been using Keycloak for a while, it's definitely not bad, but there are times when it's been frustrating, and getting it both stable and scalable seem to be incompatible goals.

It's super powerful and can do whatever you want it to do (at least if you are comfortable writing Java SPI). But there's a lot of knowledge of how to set things up that takes time and is not readily acquired.

For the record we looked at Ory early on, but it was not mature enough and didn't offer a full IdP stack at the time. We've since looked again and found there to be some conventions around how it works that made it hard for us to consider migrating from Keycloak.

It's a learning curve, but it can work, you just need to be comfortable with large (and likely quite negative) reviews for the inevitable large MRs that will get generated.

The important things to get right are the same as they were before though. Work from well refined stories that are not too broad in scope. Ensure you have enough good acceptance criteria that will help prove that the code works as intended.

Maybe they will have to use/repair/upgrade the ones they already own?

Is the "Water Project" intended as a sly dig or some kind of nod to AI water use concerns?

Don't make the "Don't paste the AI website, please" site. You can rather use some kind of search tool to find one of the many that already exist. If it's not quite saying what you want, maybe just reach out to the author with an ask for them to update it. Then we get one place everybody knows about, rather than the many many sites (likely all AI generated anyway) that dilute the message.

How does this mean you don't need an api?

My "favourite" site was <https://6a6fa3376288679d094a8437--ar-testing-coffee-2b15c6a0...> with footer image captions that are amazing. Precision Late Art being the best one.

Who could have guessed this would end up with many polarised "massive problem" / "not a problem" comments

Isn't there value to the verbose information too? Knowing what a tool does and what the inputs are increase the likelyhood of successful tool calls.

I liked Boop's[1] strapline for this:

> Stop pasting company secrets into random websites.

[1]<https://boop.okat.best/>

nostalgia's not what it used to be

May I suggest opening issues on the repo if you're keen for feedback?

> If you're sharing your own work and there's a way to try it out, put "Show HN" in the title. Make sure you've read the Show HN guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html.

:shrug:

I'm questioning what the purpose is of pushing it at this point in the project lifecycle. It may not have a fancy website but it is making flashy marketing claims in that readme. How about being upfront about the maturity of the project before making the kind of comparisons that it does.

I'm curious on the goal of releasing software like this, it's making some crazy claims right out of the gate, but is obviously not production ready or battle hardened. There's some reasonably obvious security issues and not a single test of any kind in the project.

I don't think that is a good title for what looks like a marketing plug for a git course. There's nothing of substance in there that suggests there's 15 years worth of anything going on.

GPT doesn't render but does actually work, Grok does not fully work Two scrambles in a row and the thing is broken.

Having a timer is maybe not so much the problem, but there's no reward here for doing early words quickly and no appreciation for the fact that difficulty is not linear. Would be nice if you could bank up some time for when harder ones come.

Grok doesn't even solve the cube if you scramble more than once, that is NOT the AI you wan't building your software, no matter how cheap.

The plan is to replace the tier 3 reps too

Yarborough is _also_ an English town so I should have got one more

Or to look at it another way, they're perfectly happy to let you stand in a queue, outside, on the runway, in the cold/heat, waiting for them to unload/load the plane that has just landed and is often already late.

Or in other words: https://noslopgrenade.com/

> Atrophy. I've already noticed that I am slowly starting to atrophy my ability to write code manually. Generation (writing code) and discrimination (reading code) are different capabilities in the brain. Largely due to all the little mostly syntactic details involved in programming, you can review code just fine even if you struggle to write it.

https://xcancel.com/karpathy/status/2015883857489522876

That is all the stuff that should be in the README.md of the project in the first place though.

What a weird title for an article about something almost entirely unrelated

But they pretty much just copied the MBP (and added USB-A)