16,689 karma · joined October 20, 2010
Corporations avoiding legal trouble is the one thing in common between American, Chinese, or any other AI company, really.
1. https://www.404media.co/not-just-david-mayer-chatgpt-breaks-...
A promoted president Vance will be in no way constrained or contained by MAGA if he has Thiel in his corner.
DeepSeek has proven that the latter is possible, which drops a couple of River crossing rocks into the moat.
Acquisitions are one way to make money off big tech. Breaking them up and buying parts of them for cents on the dollar are another, especially if you can issue barely veiled threats of government-backed retaliation if they refuse to come to the table with your allies/fronts. With a "loosened regulations" regime, IPOs may be even more profitable than acquisitions.
Sequoia Capital, the 900 lb gorilla of VCs reportedly had $102B in funds/assets in 2024. Apple just had $124B as first quarter revenue and had over $200B in cash reserves after a $30B stock buyback. I don't know the size of the funds Vance oversaw, but I bet dollars to donuts, the scale is far bigger at big tech.
1. Or carbon monoxide mask, if the distress of asphyxiation is throwing you off the from point I'm trying to make
1. https://social.treehouse.systems/@marcan/113914172433692339
The US government has the wherewithal to drag Europe along with it, like they did with Huawei's 5G equipment.
I am certain they'll get the deal they deserve. For every complex problem, there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong
Anyone who tells you history is unbiased is either lying, or a propagandists standing by with a pitcher of Kool-Aid.
Now that we have established you're willing to pay to prevent diseases spreading to the US, why do you think that screening at the border is superior to reducing the worldwide incidence, or eradicating them and never having to screen for them ever again?
It's a bundled deal, sorry. It's not just governments that avoid admin overheads - no auto insurance I know will let you pick which specific impacts to insure against a la carte, just to reduce your premiums.
Also, no 2 people will ever agree on the same government spend (to the nearest million), so I don't see the point of your exercise to personally quantify how ones tax dollars should be directed. The point of having a representative government is so that individual citizens don't need referendum on how much to pay for toilet paper at an USAF base in Japan, or disease reconnaissance in central Africa - but both things benefit US citizens (broadly speaking) and need to be done, so congress allocates the money.