sabertoothed

Your definitions are wrong.

Why did that trigger you?

Why don't you specify what you are good at and maybe people offer you a job here?

Evolution was just an example to illustrate how far religious superstition reaches.

Disbelief in science in general has a massive impact - causing deaths.

Even disbelief in evolution causes deaths, e.g. if we don't do enough to deal with antibiotic resistance.

Islam is not the predominant problem in the US. Really not. Nearly half of US Americans don't believe in evolution. Christian fundamentalism causes much more harm at the moment than islamists.

Politics and religious beliefs are intertwined. Especially in the US (in the Western world).

Not OP but German as well. Can confirm statement.

Sources are easy to find but are mostly in German, e.g.

https://www.welt.de/wissenschaft/umwelt/article139797061/Geh...

http://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellschaft/tschernobyl-folgen-r...

http://www.umweltinstitut.org/themen/radioaktivitaet/tschern...

Why is resolving uncertainty a human trait? Human, as in non-humans don't do it?

Why would resolving uncertainty lead to a false sense of confidence?

Without some explanations it's impossible to understand what you want to say.

I doubt it. I don't think he is that smart. He can't even talk like a normal person.

I am working in that niche as well - probably even in a special niche of that niche.

Could I get in touch with you via PM?

To add to the other comments:

RL is also extremely useful in scenarios where rules cannot easily be made explicit. Think of riding a bike or flying a helicopter or gripping objects with a robot arm. Here we can more easily define the reward function - but the agent has to figure out how to do things (to maximise expected reward).

The problem is not the first sentence. It is the second one.

We all knew it was complex. He said it wasn't. But had no clue.

You're not wrong; but you are not right either.

Of course, most of the revenue today is generated from selling cars. But we were talking about the value of the company. And this includes expected _future_ returns. And, obviously, Tesla has more than just aspirations. They have built a large part of the Gigafactory already.

Honda certainly is not a car company - but much more than this as well. This was not a good example for your case. Same with GM. I am not sure if your intention was to list companies that are much more than car companies? You were just making my case.

Tesla is not only a car company anymore.

The commenter above is right on this one and it is not a subjective statement. This is a fact.

You might want to look up the definition of 'learning' from Arthur Samuel / Tom Mitchell. That might help you in your confusion.

It is about both. Machines AND learning.

This is just to let you know that we are working on all the issues you mentioned. We already updated the game balancing. An updated GUI is in the works. And we would like to send you digital hugs via our new static website:

http://getbuggle.com/legal.html#

Many thanks again, icefox.

I don't think you are right, here. At least from a factual "as is" legal standpoint but also from my moral standpoint ("what should be" / normative).

I am not sure which standpoint you are addressing.

The easiest standpoint to defend is the factual / descriptive "as is" legal standpoint:

Insults / defamations are legally not allowed in most countries.

False advertisement IS indeed an exception to free speech. See here [1].

But maybe you were not talking about descriptive claims but normative ones. This would be a very different discussion.

[1] = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exce...

While I agree with your overall sentiment, your statement "censorship which is evil and stupid" is clearly overly simplistic and, hence, wrong.

100% free speech does not exist in _any_ country (not even the US) - and it would not even be desirable. A society is better off overall if there are limits to free speech (think of insults, false advertisement, incitement, etc.).

You probably have to argue in a more nuanced way.

I am currently contemplating an idea around processing *.svg. Here, for example, I could not find any nice library for Python that deals with this mess of XML tags in SVGs. I could run it in JavaScript on a server or maybe still in Python.

It would be nice to have a website to look for similar projects and how they defined their stack.

Thanks for your reply!

You're a star, mate. We should definitely stay in touch. Incredibly valuable feedback for us.

Edit: typo

OK, I have read it three times and copied your suggestions into a structured table.

I agree with everything you said. That was valuable.

Can we buy you a beer somehow?

Wow, thank you! This is even more than I hoped for.

I will carefully read through all of this and come back to you.

Many, many thanks!

EDIT: Your feedback is probably the most useful and richest we have ever gotten.

Clickable link: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/buggle-td-tower-defense-50/i...

Thanks. I was too naive.

Oh.

I am confused. So when you donate you choose the charity yourself and transfer it directly? Is that what it means?

I cannot find the information which charities will receive the money. Should this not be mentioned?

EDIT: It's OK. I was naive. I had thought it was a joke AND had a good cause.

I would not call freedom of speech and free elections "western democratic prescriptions". If that is what you meant.

But I would (honestly) like to thank you for your response.

Interesting how you did not address his/her first point...