Why are they holding Parler to a different standard?
347 karma · joined March 30, 2018
Why are they holding Parler to a different standard?
One of the permissions you have to grant to the container proxy add on is:
“Access your data for all websites”
That’s not acceptable.
That’s a case of harassment and possibly some form of identity theft.
I don’t find your proposal tenable and it would obviously be prone to abuse.
This is way outside my area of expertise, but my understanding is the patent would only prevent others from monetizing the patented technology for x period of time.
That to me would be the key difference. In this case the claim is you can’t even grow the grapes in your own yard non-commercially.
Is it illegal to infringe on a software patent even if you’re not distributing or profiting from the software you wrote?
Not really. The expectation is that as a paying customer you’ll have access to the music you’re interested in. Their shtick has never been curation.
Freedom of speech and expression is the bedrock of the civilized world, an important part of modern culture and is indeed defined as a human right in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
> "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers".