248 karma · joined November 3, 2021
Anyway this is all alternate history, just as the discussions in GP. How could we say something is a failure when we have no real way of understanding its effects
The fact of the matter is that the Cold War was won, and the CIA was a major part of it. You could analyze every coup that was started in Latin America as a mistake, but you can’t really say what was the alternative
Consider this, how much of the world population has access to running water? a computer? medicine? English is their first language or has a US visa? So how many of these can realistically study at one of the world’s top universities?
Consider this and you will understand that even this one kid that studied in the high school with gang violence is so called privileged, and so is any citizen of the US.
Think about it and you’ll see this is just a way to shift guilt to some magical top 1%, while anyone born in a western country has a significant advantage, and the way Capitalism is structured, anyone has an "unfair" advantage on some other person
By that logic community college is also a privilege granted upon those with enough money for tuition and enough time to attend
This is of course taking one facet of Capitalism, calling it by a scare word (privilege) and forgetting about at all the other identical parts
You cannot call something that takes skill and hard work a privilege. Privilege is something you’re born with, such as gentry. It also completely excludes these that are not born with that privilege, which is not the case here
My point being is that barring any proof of cheating, merely graduating from an elite university does indicate some level of competence. It requires some very hard work which in STEM not just anyone could do, and therefore it is unfair to say this is some god given privilege
Also, you cannot say how many of these graduates had access to the advantages you’ve listed above, and how much of the general population as a whole does
So, American Factory, the best I’ve seen about globalization and its less glamorous results
about the examples, if you would take extreme slurs against minorities, these are not used in a professional environment already so they are never these that are discussed
The words that are discussed are such that are established for a different connotation. that connotation is completely metaphorical and does not carry any real insult, yet some insist on literalizing those, or finding hidden meanings
Newspeak is actually a very similar approach to what’s going on currently because it removes words that allows communicating ideologically problematic concepts. What’s going on with the entire blacklist/whitelist issues is based on the assumption that removing a word that describes a perceived injustice will remove that injustice from the world. It is an approach that is completely blind to the real meaning a word has taken, and tries to folk etymologically hack a different interpretation. This is why the real insulting words are never these that debated.
Both Newspeak and "rightspeak" think that language creates reality rather than the other way around
Notice who you call as ‘they’ didn’t portray him as a self-proclaimed idealist, but someone with an unstable personality and who weaponizes workplace bureaucracy for petty fights
We do know for a fact that he filed for a restraining order against his coworker, that seems extremely weird to me, and I don’t work for the CIA.
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar
Even if this exploit only touches completely new code, my point still stands that windows has multiple layers of archeology which were designed when security was an afterthought.
Some of these are preinstalled with Windows, use networking and run as SYSTEM (WMI, spool) others are used by enough components in windows they will never be removed yet it doesn’t seem they are undergoing any development (COM/OLE)
If I were a security researcher I would look at anything that came from win 3.11, probably full of holes
Jesus told his believers to eat his flesh and blood to get eternal life (John 6:53–57)
Someone took it literally and opened the grave, and ate the body
This is how the body disappeared suddenly and the grave was open. Others seeing this thought this was a miracle. Meaning Jesus came back to life, opened the grave and left
Whoever was involved had a good reason to keep that secret
I didn’t see the email API and it is not obvious to me if this breaks any privacy protection (or what is the threat), but generating a lot of SHA-1 hashes for popular gmail addresses is probably very possible
But I think we can agree that the goal when choosing these names isn’t really being concise and easy to use
And to those who say this is not inclusive to the colorblind, I say traffic lights
I guess for me these statistics would be easier to digest if they were centered around poverity: e.g. How many cars did your family own, size of childhood home or something of that sort