rolls-reus

The article has citations to some rulings that affirm the point it is making. "Wallpaper Mfrs., Ltd. v. Crown Wallcovering Corp., 680 F.2d 755, 766 (C.C.P.A. 1982) (“an owner is not required to act immediately against every possibly infringing use to avoid a holding of abandonment”);"

I've seen the point you make about trademarks often repeated but it is infact not true. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/11/trademark-law-does-not...

Wow I remember wasting a lot of time on bash.org maybe a decade ago. That link sent me on a nostalgia trip.

Redshift is not eventually consistent, it's fully ACID compliant.