I'm hoping that with ahead of time compile option at least will give you some actual feedback as to what's happening. That'd at least be better than watching the browser sit there loading a page for while.
90 karma · joined March 24, 2009
I'm hoping that with ahead of time compile option at least will give you some actual feedback as to what's happening. That'd at least be better than watching the browser sit there loading a page for while.
The readme contains an itemized comparison, though it sounds some of this actual comparison may be out of date or more specific to git-encrypt (yet another project) git-crypt does appear to use openssl libraries for example.
transcrypt is just a Bash script and does not require compilation
transcrypt uses OpenSSL's symmetric cipher routines rather then implementing its own crypto
transcrypt does not have to remain installed after the initial repository configuration
transcrypt generates a unique salt for each encrypted file
transcrypt uses safety checks to avoid clobbering or duplicating configuration data
transcrypt facilitates setting up additional clones as well as rekeying
transcrypt adds an alias git ls-crypt to list all encrypted files
Why does YCM demand such a recent version of Vim? ~
During YCM's development several show-stopper bugs where encountered in Vim. Those needed to be fixed upstream (and were). A few months after those bugs were fixed, Vim trunk landed the 'pyeval()' function which improved YCM performance even more since less time was spent serializing and deserializing data between Vim and the embedded Python interpreter. A few critical bugfixes for 'pyeval()' landed in Vim 7.3.584 (and a few commits before that).
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/aejoelaoggembcahag...
http://technotales.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/like-slime-for-v...
Is there a similar comparison to boo?