$2,345 / (40 * 3) = $19.5416666667/hr
I guess if you're just starting, that's decent money, but I don't think I could run with the same idea myself. I'd probably need to add a 1 to the front of your number.
144 karma · joined April 12, 2008
$2,345 / (40 * 3) = $19.5416666667/hr
I guess if you're just starting, that's decent money, but I don't think I could run with the same idea myself. I'd probably need to add a 1 to the front of your number.
I don't see how I can apply this to my daily life.
I've managed to whittle down most email to a few short sentences, but I can think of plenty of examples where I've written up intricate math notes and made them into blog posts that never got any page views because they were so hyper-specific.
Put another way, some businesses running on bitcoin are still operating like ordinary fiat businesses (e.g. fractional reserve of bitcoin). They will be replaced by those that can leverage the blockchain, for it's security, and therefore maintain a higher level of trust.
The unsolved problem space that is solved by building a website is shrinking year over year. It would seem obvious that you need a larger skill set to solve problems no one has attempted yet.
I honestly think most of it can be skipped. The age-old adgage that "a ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" is totally obsolete with respect to longevity science. Once you've gone past your DNA's "expiration date", it's easier to repair damage than prevent it.
Why should we measure medical technology at the rate of new drugs developed? What about the speed of DNA sequencing advancing faster than Moore's law? What about Organovo's recent claims on 3D printing organs, with vascular system in place, by next year? What about advanced prothesis that can provide touch senses to the user? Or even visual or audio prothesis, made possible with advancements in brain-computer interfaces?
Your argument basically boils down to saying that the rate of CPU clock speeds developed in recent history is indicative of an overall slowdown in computer science. Clearly there are other paradigms that need to be explored before we can say that Moore's law is no longer relevant, let alone all of computing.
Yes, the average of all medical tech is going to always lag behind computing for ethical reasons. And that of course, there are ways we can improve medical testing using stem cell research. But to say that we're at risk of moving backwards because one or two particular areas are in serious need of optimization is a bit far-fetched.
You can enable that behavior for MongoDB, but then you're just getting ordinary SQL-style behavior, so why were you using MongoDB in the first place?
> Since then, I’ve been hired for dream projects at my own price.
Would you be interested in a remote (east coast) Rails engineer w/ 8 years experience?
* Brain cells die. * Brain cells hold ideas. * We need to regenerate brain cells to continue to support the brain past 80-90 years. * Each new brain cell will probably adopt the ideas of the surrounding culture.
So I would suspect that over time, an aging but renewed brain will adapt to the conditions of the culture it lives in. Some brain cells are more stubborn than others, but a serious and dedicated effort to not adapt will be met with obvious survival constraints.
While the idea looks great, it seemed slow to react to my key presses. Maybe they can fix that in the near future. Otherwise I'm probably sticking to xterm.
This is an area where software engineers who've made serious profits and turn around to become investors have an edge over traditional that do not understand the levels of risk involved with large software projects.
Explaining the granularity in the types of risk that are involved is complicated to people that expect to write a check once and have a finished product come out of it.