3,760 karma · joined May 10, 2020
having the most secure data center doesn't matter if you load your secrets as env vars in a system that can be easily compromised by a motivated attacker
so i don't buy this argument as a general reason pro-cloud
a lot of employers actually like engineers who come from a personal hacking background more than traditional paths, because we're truly passionate and care deeply. we're not in for 8-5 and a paycheck.
call it whatever you want, but don't ever mention a BSD License if you've modified it.
they're literally doing that. google has +$300B net positive assets. [1] they could distribute that to stockholders, go to the bahamas and call it a day. but they keep this wealth there so that SWEs can "play" and create stuff for others to use.
yes, they're not a humanitatian org. they do it so that they earn more, then invest more. but they are sacrificing short term gains and risking actually losing money.
Regarding infra, they were not capable of reaching the scale they needed and were already struggling by the time they got acquired.
On the money side, they couldn't attract advertisers as well as Google.
if you have strong consistency requirements, this doesn't work. synchronizing clocks reliably between different servers is surprisingly hard. you might end up working with stale data. might work for use cases that can accept eventual consistency.
You say like it's something easy anyone can get done. Have you ever tried? If you try to build a sustainable and successful business, you'll see how hard it is.
let's also not forget that the people involved didn't create this in a vacuum. it cost Google a LOT more than their compensation to make it possible for them to even start working on this project, let alone carrying it forward to completion.
people underestimate how hard and expensive it is to manage a company in a way that allows its employees to do a good job.
our minds tend to fantasize a lot about our early days. our memories are flawed and what we remember now are full of gaps filled with fantasies that make us feel good.
all right, yeah, it's not "open source", but hey, it is open to use and they're publishing their research openly as well.
Yes, they're calling it "agentic" AI or "tool use".
> or could run that shell command with appropriate privileges?
Yes, it's called humans doing stupid shit when using dangerous shit. Happens daily.
Finally!..
Eco is clever, because they reuse good hardware pieces to assemble new servers, instead of throwing out as garbage...
Have been a very happy user with several servers for quite some time.
The only reason I still use OpenAI's API and chatbot service is o1-preview. o1 is like magic. Everything Sonnet and 4o do poorly, o1 solves like a piece of cake. Architecting, bug fixing, planning, refactoring, o1 has never let me know on any 'hard' task.
A nice combo is have o1 guiding Sonnet. I ask o1 to come up with a solution and explanation, then simply feed its response into Sonnet to execute. That running on Aider really feels like futuristic stuff.