1,266 karma · joined December 23, 2011
* blocking popular and/or controversial political figures
* blocking whole list of controversial or outrage keywords
* training myself to skip tweets by outrage machine when they succeed to sneak through above two filters
* unfollowing anyone who has poor signal to noise ratio. More tweets about outrage than about anything I find useful.
With all these my twitter experience has been relatively pleasant.
I have seen a startup where ciritical data processing infrastructure doesn't have any kind of tests because the management doesn't understand technical importance. While the front end team which develops a simple web interface for just showing the data to customers follows TDD, tries to achieve 100% code coverage, every single function has documentation, extensive code reviews and whatever new clean-code techniques you can think of. Not surprisingly the front end team has 6 times more people than the data processing team. Obviously bad management is to blame here. But I can't help but think how much all these tech debt and clean code artciles on the internet is responsible for this. Advising people blindly to follow some development methodologies without the discussion in which contexts these methodlogies are acceptable, what are the costs and what are the trade-offs. There's a lot of resume driven developers out there find these articles and waste business resources to fill in their resumes.
Excatly. Microsoft owned GitHub is more interested into getting more customers for Azure than GitHub itself.
They discontinued the sale, not the product support. Not sure what the outrage about. Am I missing anything?
I've heard the same thing in startups and other companies. This is not something unique to Google.
Every Google related thread immediately becomes a thread of bashing Google's history of killing products. I don't know how many times people need to have the same conversation again and again. This has gotten to the point that I don't open any Google related threads. I am here to read thoughtful discussions, not some broken records again and again. Internet forum is hard.
You hit the nail on the head. The worst outcome of these types of research is implicit victim blaming. People growing up in marginalized communities never get the opportunities to be successful in life. There are a lot of reasons why someone is not accomplished and not having the "right" thought is pretty down on the list. Instead of very carefully describing the limitations of these techniques, they do complete opposites. They hype up and overgeneralize to have publicity and sell more books and seminars.
Lots of research in CBT is plagued with abuse of statistics, manipulation of randomized controlled trials, sensalization, and over-hype. For the vast majority of time CBT is good for symptomp reduction and patients relapse frequently. Frankly, the depressed people I know in real life, I don't know how many of them would be benefitted by CBT style therapy.
My own experience is it took me almost a year of therapy, reading psychology and philosophy, lots of self-relfection and going to dark places in my mind to see marked improvement in my depression. If you are suffering from depression, please give psychotherapy a try. It'd be hard, but it's worth it!
Fake news, seriously? There's an entire wikipedia article about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huanan_Seafood_Wholesale_Marke.... Please verify your own news source before spreading more fake news/
> Yes, outbreak of zootonic diseases is still possible through widely consumed firm animals (chickens, pigs, or cows). But we can dramatically reduce the risk of next pandemic if we stop eating exotic wild animals like bats, which is not hard to give up.
Washing your hands is not going to stop every single disease on the earth, but it'll reduce the risk. What exactly is the unsound part here?
Bat soup was used as an example. It would help the discussion if we stop taking everything in the most literal way possible.
CBT is often oversold as a cure for every kind of mental health issues. New meta-research has found that the effectiveness of CBT has been decreasing for quite some time and long-term effectiveness of CBT is arguable.
Regarding effectiveness of AA, I think it makes sense. Lot of people with addiction suffer from childhood trauma, emtional neglect, and abandonment. In psychological term it is called attachment injury. A community where you are not shamed, validated, understood, and accepted would give corrective emotional experience, which would in turn heal your attachment trauma. I've heard this phrase somewhere: "what cures people in therapy is love". So it's not surprising that finding a community where you are accepted would help you treat your addiction.