returnInfinity

Lets take the example of Uber. If Uber ships 10x the code and features, I will still not 2x my rides.

Even if Uber makes the cost of travel to 0, I will still not 2x my rides.

And look at what that led to. Democracy is not a panacea.

I don't get the atlassian backlash on HN

JIRA is just fine, gets the job done. Its not slow like the on-prem. Jira cloud version is fine.

Sergey said that Google was able to rapidly respond to ChatGPT because Sundar had already invested a lot into AI.

They have the people, the models and the chips. And Sundar helped achieve that.

That's what he said on some podcast.

This thing makes me really sad.

Whenever I get less sleep, tinnitus gets really bad.

And why should a business do that? Limited chip production capacity be spent on most profitable ventures.

Most regular people, they don't care and will continue to use ChatGPT

ChatGPT has 900 million users now, across continents and they don't care about this DoW deal.

Offtopic - The success of coding agents must be Ed Zitron's nightmare.

He has been a perpetual bear

This could be anthropic's marketing team.

This isn't the usecase that's being criticized. Here you are responsible for the fix. You will validate and ship it and if something goes wrong, you will answer for it. The AI won't answer for it.

The key word from the video is "responsibility".

Who is going to be responsible for the code? AI is definitely not responsible.

look at gold price

Sam and Dario "The society can tolerate a few deaths to AI"

If the role is eliminated, then the responsibility of the verifying and managing the docs will fall on somebody else.

AI does not take responsibility

This is a step to take control and move in a direction that will profit them greatly.

May or may not benefit the community.

They are probably trying to build influence. Why is a startup that is burning cash donating money?

"The society will tolerate some amount of deaths to AI vehicles"

Its not unlimited, the compute allocation was one of the reason for the coup at OpenAI

KEF Q Series Speakers, Q11 Meta, Q6 Meta

This is the right take

Also maintaining a software is pain

Also for perpetually small companies, its now easy to build simple scripts to be achieve some productivity gains.

My thoughts as well, good at somethings and terrible for somethings and you will lose time.

Somethings are best written by yourself.

And this is with the mighty claude opus 4.5

Yes sick of AI generated "illustrations".

This is fueled by the parabolic token usage. If token usage continues to grow parabolic, then these are the most genius deals made.

If token usage declines because of high prices, look at what happened to SBF.

Code is secondary. Pmf is primary.

Code is a commodity. Very easy to make. Now even llms are commodities. There are other intangible assets more valuable. Like the chatgpt brand here.

ChatGpt has won. I talk to all teens living nearby and they all use chatgpt and not Google.

The teens, they don't know what is OpenAI, they don't know what is Gemini. They sure know what is ChatGPT.

It's a lot more complicated, but yes advertising works.

There is a saying in India, whats seen is what is sold.

Not the hidden best product.

Without the algorithm, TikTok is not TikTok.

When Tiktok was banned in India, everyone tried to recreate it, include Instagram. Everyone failed to get anywhere close to TikTok for you page.

Once the new algorithm is live, expect massive backlash.

Using AI effectively is a skill. As more people acquire it, it gets more useful.

AI also enables everyone to make simple apps for fun. They may get serious and build great things as well.