3,623 karma · joined September 6, 2010
I don't get this argument. If there are 100 open positions and 80 eligible candidates, 20 (at least) positions will remain vacant, regardless of compensation. Not saying that this example reflects the real world, just that the argument is not sound from a logical/mathematical standpoint.
Sounds like a titillating story, I'd be love to read it if you post it.
[1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/ipdb [2] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pdbpp
GIT_COMMITTER_DATE='$BOGUS_DATE' GIT_AUTHOR_DATE='$BOGUS_DATE' git commit
is your friend ;)Good for you, you'll feel right at home because that's exactly what's happening in JS-land, and it's a major reason many of us opt to stay the hell away from such a fad-driven development ecosystem.
As for #3, I kinda see the motivation in statically typed languages for integrating independent libraries and frameworks with different naming conventions. In a dynamically typed language though refactoring is already bad enough, this would make it even harder. My "refactoring tool" of choice is grep (or rather ag, https://github.com/ggreer/the_silver_searcher), with choice #3 you can't just grep for an identifier anymore.
I'm wondering how harder is to find this out if it's not so blatant, say two owner who are friends and based on different locations. Or for added stealthiness, if there's a third party between them so they never contact each other directly (at least online).