2,573 karma · joined September 28, 2009
So I think every community is interpreting the post with their own bias (it also showed up on Reddit). The context that is missing is that (1) you work for a company that writes amazing open source software to analyze satellite imagery and that as many other companies in the space have found out the hard way, (2) competing with ESRI marketing is absolutely difficult - you have some battle scars already from it. Cheers!
Perú: there are 992 for the entire country (195 are still free).
Summary: under control, but still not great.
Hello from Peru! Where I have been in lockdown for 58 days straight and counting...
Also, not sure you can limit to surroundings just yet... people are still moving too much.
This is my summary of how I interpreted it works:
- A [Tracing Key] is stored locally in every device.
- A [Rolling Key] gets regenerated every day based on the [Tracing Key]
- A [Proximity Identifier] gets regenerated every 15 minutes and broadcasted to other bluetooth devices.
- The Contact Tracing Bluetooth Specification does not require the user’s location; any use of location is completely optional to the schema.
- Other devices save the [Proximity Identifier] locally.
- History is stored for a couple of weeks
Some questions about how I interpreted the rest:
- The device wakes up once a day and downloads the list of identifiers that have been known/reported to have COVID. It compares on device that you are on that list. Q: Wouldn't this list be insanely long? More so if it doesn't have any concept of location?
- If you have COVID-19, you can report to the servers that you were found to have it. Your rolling identifiers gets uploaded to the "cloud server". Q: Which "cloud server"? Whose cloud server?
Any clarifications are strongly welcomed :)
- If diagnosed with COVID-19, users consent to sharing Diagnosis Keys with the server.
https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/27/politics/coronavirus-stim...
While MS had products like hololens out, Magic Leap was still “in stealth”. This is the same company that was “worth billions” before they even released a product or before they had made public whatever product they wanted to sell. The marketing videos they produced early on (which were impressive) look nothing like the technology that was released years later. Look up the expectation vs reality videos of if you want a laugh.
Now they want out at a crazy valuation.
When the economy is “good” and there is plenty of dumb cash lying around (think these past years of bubble build up), an expert sweet talker is able to command money away from the vision fund type of folks. However, then the situation is like we are right now, we go back to the basics... things like market-fit, income, revenue, growth, sustainability... the healthy business.
We need the bubbles of the Magic Leaps, WeWorks and all the other unsustainable unicorn startups to burst. This is what will bring us back to industry sanity. The first dotcom bubble burst made our industry better. I hope this one does, too.
Contrast that with AWS, where I had 4 engineers (back when our bill was 12k/year) helping us with recommending certain arquitectures and actively being useful anytime we reach out.
Our AWS expenses tripled because of growth and us choosing them for new components while our GCP expenses have remained flat.
Amounts like 30k/year may not sound big to many folks, but when you go to a truly good SaaS organization and spend that kind of cash, you get excellent support (online or offline). Google has absolutely amazing services that for the most part do not require human support, but for the times that you actually do, it is simply non-existant.
- territorial planning (e.g. cadastre and zoning)
- agricultural yield improvements (irrigation and disease detection, crop classification, etc)
- forest fire detection
- illegal mining, illegal deforestation or illegal plantation detection
- pre-disaster planning and post-disaster recovery
and other military activities. the use cases depend a lot on the type of satellite they own
Additionally, after a country purchases one, they tend to have their own development path for the future ones.
For example, the Argentinians did their first four satellites with the help of the US (SAC-A, SAC-B, SAC-C, SAC-D), the next two were done by themselves (ARSAT-1, ARSAT-2), two more with the Italians (SAOCOM-A, SAOCOM-B) and one with the Brazilians (SABIA-MAR).
It is a process filled with a lot of politics, questionable monetary interests, and pseudo national pride.
It is the new shortcut process by which countries are entering the space era. Buy a satellite when you don't know what you are doing, then co-build it with somebody, then build it by yourself. It effectively saves you billions in trial and error tests that other countries had to go through... but it really begs the question of when is it truly yours, because if you don’t follow the rules (e.g. taking high res imagery of an area you are not supposed to), “your” satellite can easily be temporarily or permanently disabled... and there goes your 300M