If for example Cloudflare decided to offer this SNI-based TLS passthrough, they could no longer give you adequate DDoS protection, caching, analytics etc.
2,467 karma · joined October 13, 2021
If for example Cloudflare decided to offer this SNI-based TLS passthrough, they could no longer give you adequate DDoS protection, caching, analytics etc.
If you assume the origin speaks TLS and holds the cert/private key, and isn't using ESNI/ECH, then I suppose in a limited way it's possible. But...
> because they want to intercept all your traffic so the NSA gets a copy.
I don't believe that is the reason. I believe it's for features.
You need actual TLS termination to do most things CDNs and reverse proxies offer, such as:
- caching and compression
- WAF / bot detection
- URL-based routing
- header manipulation and redirects
- application-layer DDoS filtering
- analytics
- edge functions and content transformation
The comments on that post were not nearly as favorable as this one for some reason.
If you are worried about such a device being on your person, I think the easy solution is just not to wear or buy one.
It's relevant that a screenshot doesn't have a signature, in the case that you want to remove any "proof" or tracking info from a real photo when uploading an image. Maybe I don't want people to know what brand/model of camera I use.
And it's relevant if a screenshot did have a signature if you want to "prove" that the screenshot itself hasn't been tampered with after the fact.
You can't proxy TLS for people without having the ability to see the decrypted data somewhere inside the server software/RAM. They (or a government) may or may not be looking at it or storing it, but the possibility is there.
And this still doesn't help any other kind of image e.g. screenshots, photo of a screen etc. that can make the camera signatures largely pointless depending on the context.
There's several factors at play that make this (usually) not the case.
Besides physical latency (which includes those added by any VPNs/tunnels/etc., some of which may be internal to an ISP along the route and outside of your control), there's other things like the TCP window sizes / window scaling option[1] that can affect single stream performance, and those type of parameters can differ by OS/interface type on both ends.
Also for SSH specifically, it has its own fixed buffer size that also limits throughput unless you're using the HPN-SSH fork[2].
What is this separate feature you claim that is not the same as the one I refer to?
How do I know this? I have received reports from various websites (and manually queried some public block lists/RBL/etc.) that my IP range was blocked due to all sorts of different things like open proxies, CSAM etc. even if I've never visited that site before, and I know just from being a neteng that that such traffic is not originating from my devices/router and I don't have any observably compromised devices or suspicious traffic when monitoring it.
You can literally just "choose" to be happy, assuming there are no big mental health barriers in the way.
Or rather, you can choose behaviors and perspectives that influence your emotional state, even when you can't directly command the emotion itself.
No, it's not easy. Controlling your emotions can be very difficult, but that is actually how it works if you think hard enough about it.
Thousands of lines of text just to add one sentence to the prompt.
You must set your TV to a different standby mode and enable LG voice control.
When you do this, it very plainly tells you that it can listen with the screen off so you can control the TV with voice.
Failure of User Awareness, not some nefarious spyware.
As soon as I saved the document, they all vanished.
Then the developers mocked me for complaining.
Now I just use real MS Office in a snapshotted virtual machine, because it works every time and loads just as fast.
I think this was an inevitable outcome of western culture's individualism being inherently selfish.
You must set your TV to a different standby mode and enable LG voice control.
When you do this, it very plainly tells you that it can listen with the screen off so you can control the TV with voice.
Failure of User Awareness, not some nefarious spyware.