I would like to know whose stands to benefit from this the most. Is it about improving quality of life for patients? Or to save costs for health insurers who won't have to pay for treatment of the side effects of the more aggressive options?
That gut feeling resonates with so many that few care to question it. It just feels right. Problem is, it feels right to the kind of person that habitually weighs the benefits and drawbacks of their actions, is able to reason about consequences and has a good grip on their impulses. Those people would be unlikely to steal Amazon packages even if the sentence was a fine and 30 days of social work because they are usually in a different place in society anyway. (Don't get hung up on exceptions)
Those that decide to steal anyway are often those that think they won't get caught. It doesn't matter if they don't sit in prison for 2 years or for 25. I'm sure there are other dynamics at play as well. Unfortunately I can't cite research to support my claims but then neither can you. So I just invite you to consider them.
Ultimately it was her responsibility, yes. But I've seen loud, big and aggressive people get their say too many times to not think that they are part of the problem. At least ethically.
I really want to make the switch from Google maps to OSM but i always find that I also want to look up some data about the destination, usually the opening hours. Sometimes the reviews. OSM just doesn't have enough coverage for the place where I live. I wished there was some project that automatically looked up businesses in Google maps and copied their details to OSM but most likely that would violate some t&c or something like that.
So how much of the 8s is spent in the LLM vs Piper?
Some of the example responses are very long for the typical home automation usecase which would compound the problem. Ample room for GladOS to be sassy but at 8s just too tardy to be usable.
A different approach might be to use the LLM to produce a set of GladOS-like responses upfront and pick from them instead of always letting the LLM respond with something new. On top of that add a cache that will store .wav files after Piper synthesized them the first time.
A cache is how e.g. Mycroft AI does it. Not sure how easy it will be to add on your setup though.
In the experience of my department, event sourcing has brought complexity, not taken it away. Theoretically, when done right, by skilled and disciplined teams and to store the state of one system to build projections off of and not to publish state changes to other systems, I think it might work. But in most cases it's overkill. A big investment with an uncertain payoff.
The overwhelming majority of users couldn't care less about this stuff as long as their phones play the content that they and their peers are into right now. If the alternative works well, is easy to switch to and is affordable then maybe they can be persuaded by their more tech savvy friends but if any of those three are compromised then you won't get much adoption.
Depends on what you're trying to understand. They might not get how but it would be clear that the what hasn't changed yet. It's still about money, power, mating rights etc. Even in the face of our own demise.
If all this tech somehow managed to change the what then we might become truly incomprehensible to previous generations.
But when does that speed actually matter? Streaming 8k content can apparently be achieved with a 50mbps. So the article is concerned with applications that haven't been invented yet, did I get that right?
Of course it would be best to just ban AI. But there's no way to enforce it. An announcement of a ban using strong language will just trigger a certain kind of people to demonstrate how little they feel that the rules apply to them. This wording here at least might lead to some introspection.
Are you talking about crypto assets seized from criminals? Because it should be obvious that that's completely different from a state-run worldwide hacking operation.
We maintained a c4 model of our systems built for importing and displaying on structurizr.com and tbh, it wasn't fun. You don't get the same intuitive understanding and overview from the code that you get from a diagram and there was no fast local preview. You had to upload your code to the server.
Even worse was the fact that adding a new box usually meant realigning all arrows. As a consequence the diagrams were never kept up to date on a continuous basis.
I had a better experience using plantML for sequence diagrams. The task is easier so the output of the interpreter is typically useful without manual interventions.
It's referring to the "ubiquitous language" concept popularized by the Domain driven development (DDD) literature. The assumption is that in every business there is an existing language, i.e. a set of terms that refer to the business concepts and are used by all employees when taking about goods, processes and so on.
Developers should take care to elicit this language from their colleagues and use it in their code instead of using whatever terms come to their mind when they need to name things.
Of you don't like soy milk try oat. The better ones taste better than cow milk in a cappuccino IMO.
Meat replacement products are based on all kinds of plant proteins these days. Some of them taste pretty good, though the true meat lover won't be persuaded.
Unfortunately they are still rather pricey compared to meat, even organic meat from the supermarket. Whether this is because of the small scale of production or because the target group can and will pay a Premium I can't say.
Looking at major developments in the world I feel like we're moving away from societies that enable the best healthcare for as many as possible and rather move to nationalistic, authoritarian states that drag everybody back into a 20th century mindset.
Money spent on defence won't be spent on research and sure as hell not on affordable healthcare.
The tech might be there when you hit 50 but will you be able to afford it?
In some European countries there's a recent trend to attack people perceived as "the state", such as firefighters and paramedics in certain situations. Afaik, this is usually done by low income, uneducated people that good stone grudge and then lash out. You can indeed be happy that they don't have access to firearms.
That's a very amicable framing of what basically amounts to an inability to judge sources and adequately process information, coupled with a taste for consequence-free, amoral behavior and an authoritarian mindset.