> nuclio runs faster than bare-metal code
So I'm staring at the high-level architecture [1], and I don't see how this claim can be true. Is this claim explained somewhere?
[1] https://github.com/nuclio/nuclio#nuclio-high-level-architect...
606 karma · joined April 23, 2014
So I'm staring at the high-level architecture [1], and I don't see how this claim can be true. Is this claim explained somewhere?
[1] https://github.com/nuclio/nuclio#nuclio-high-level-architect...
Management had to figure out they needed to handle the escalations, prioritize, reduce the bottleneck, document the solutions, and teach others to fish.
This article seems to be addressing the same issue, albeit a bit more confrontationally. Anyone have recommendations for a non-fictional book on how managers can identify these problems and implement people-centric solutions?
Blackmail, threats, deceit, etc are other ways to force. Not saying that occurred here, just that your definition has a narrow scope.
Read the article, it says it too:
==================
You can turn off the anonymous data collecting of Firefox Focus by tapping on the settings icon, and flipping the switch next to "send anonymous usage data" to off.
==================
> We send 100% of all donations directly to hire local workers and buy local materials so you know exactly where your donation is going.
Considering their Careers page lists they are hiring a software engineer, I dug a little further and found this info in their FAQ:
> How Does New Story Fund Operational Costs With A 100% Promise?
> We are committed to putting every cent of donor contributions to the building of homes. We fund our day-to-day operations by generous contributions from corporate investors and private individuals. Also, a majority of our incredible donors opt-in and add 10% onto their donation to fund New Story operations. If you are interested in investing in our organization, so we can serve even more families, email info@newstorycharity.org.
The FAQ mentions an investment opportunity, though I'm not sure what the investment is, besides charity social goodwill -- which of course, is a great thing.
This was only a matter of time. We can rotate credit card numbers, but sadly not a SSN. I wish I could rotate my US social security number when significant exposure happens (this would be the 4th or 5th time in 24 months my data has been exposed).
Assuming legislation passed that allowed you to cancel an exposed SSN and get a new one, what would it take for that to happen? Surely it's not just the one agency (SSA) that would need to make the change, but multiple agencies would need to coordinate the change?
(And of course, I would be personally responsible for informing my banks, brokerages, loan agencies, etc of my new SSN)
Does anyone have insight into how this could work?
Double_a_92 is pointing out a distinction -- USD is pure legal tender, that is mandated by the US government to be accepted for payments of debts. Bitcoin is not.
Pasting the content here in case it goes down (I did not include the in-paragraph hyperlinks though).
However, here is the leaked document they reference in the first sentence: http://www.statewatch.org/news/2017/aug/eu-council-copyright...
======================================
A Council of the European Union document leaked by Statewatch on 30 August reveals that during the summer months, that Estonia (current EU Presidency) has been pushing the other Member States to strengthen indiscriminate internet surveillance, and to follow in the footsteps of China regarding online censorship. Standing firmly behind its belief that filtering the uploads is the way to go, the Presidency has worked hard in order to make the proposal for the new copyright Directive even more harmful than the Commission’s original proposal, and pushing it further into the realms of illegality.
According to the leaked document, the text suggests two options for each of the two most controversial proposals: the so-called “link tax” or ancillary copyright and the upload filter. Regarding the upload filter, the text offers two alternatives:
* Option A maintains the Commission’s original proposal of having in place an upload filter which will be under the control of platforms and other companies that are hosting online content. Although it removes mentions to “content recognition technologies”, in reality, there is no way to “prevent the availability” (another expression which remains in the text) of certain content without scanning all the content first.
* Option B is, at best, a more extreme version of Option A. In fact, it seems so extreme that it almost makes the first option look like a reasonable compromise. This may, of course, be the “diplomatic” strategy. In this extreme option, the text attacks again the liability regime of the e-commerce Directive – which, bizarrely, would not be repealed, leaving us with two contradictory pieces of EU law but adds a “clarification” of what constitutes a “communication to the public”. This clarification establishes that platforms (and its users) would be liable for the copyright infringing content uploaded by its users.
The proposals in this leak highlight a very dangerous roadmap for the EU Member States, if they were to follow the Presidency’s lead. The consequences of these flawed proposals can only be prevented if civil society and EU citizens firmly raise their voices against having a censorship machine in the EU. We will be turning on our call tool at savethememe.net before each of the key votes in the European Parliament. Make use of the tool, and call your representatives to stop the #censorshipmachine!
No, you can’t enjoy the music you paid for, says EU Parliament Committee (05.07.2017) https://edri.org/no-you-cant-enjoy-the-music-you-paid-for-sa...
Proposed Copyright Directive – Commissioner confirms it is illegal (28.06.2017) https://edri.org/proposed-copyright-directive-commissioner-c...
EU Copyright Directive – privatised censorship and filtering of free speech (10.11.2016) https://edri.org/eu-copyright-directive-privatised-censorshi...
Copyright reform: Document pool https://edri.org/copyright-reform-document-pool/
(Contribution by Diego Naranjo, EDRi)
======================================
I don't see why this has to be limited to the capabilities of an intelligence agency. Perhaps they have the motive, but I'm sure private citizens could perform the same data mining queries (without mass surveillance).
Either way, this post presents zero information and just unsubstantiated speculation.
I'm curious -- what was she managing? Did she excel in her role?
The following picture is of Dutch peacekeepers on camelback: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camel_cavalry#/media/File:UN_S...
Not to mention the anti-Taliban rebels in Afghanistan... Camel calvary are still alive and well.
Does the author of this documentary have a bit of a disdain for her, or is he merely saying that her readers/followers are misguided in some way?
But as you said, the project is unmaintained and you likely won't get a response. If you don't get a response, then the world can benefit from your fixes.
Source: https://www.ft.com/content/e8ccd7b8-6459-11e6-a08a-c7ac04ef0... [FT might be paywalled, but I was able to reach it via Google for free]
Even if the ISP means well at the beginning, the tool can be abused (ISPs injecting tracking, or reading the tracking information so they can sell it). Attackers at coffee shops and conferences can do much worse.
encrypted = secretbox.Seal(nonce[:], chunk, &nonce, &key)
While I support the right to film public officials in public (which Akins did sometimes), it seems he takes his actions too far, to the annoyance of officers.
Perhaps the judge focused on these specific instances behavior, rather than a typical event of filming an arrest?
> 16-bit wordlength, 2048 words RAM (magnetic core memory), 36,864 words ROM (core rope memory)
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer