532 karma · joined July 8, 2014
If you want to stream Dolphin to your TV, a cheap option is to use Steam's in-home streaming feature. The Steam Link is a dedicated piece of hardware for this which I think is about $50 and will work with existing controllers or the Steam controller. You can also just use any existing laptop (windows, mac, linux) with a sufficiently powerful cpu for stream decoding and use it as an in-home streaming client. I've messed around with a lot of solutions for streaming from my PC to living room TV, and Steam's solution blows just about everything else out of the water.
I suspect what he's getting at is having some set of "safety standards" to be put in place, especially for IoT tech. The whole quote of
>Our computers are secure for a bunch of reasons. The engineers at Google, Apple, Microsoft spent a lot of time on this. But that doesn’t happen for these cheaper devices. … These devices are a lower price margin, they’re offshore, there’s no teams. And a lot of them cannot be patched.
sums up that point pretty well.
I honestly don't know how you would really enforce something like this, but the proposal seems to be less about the specifics of regulation and more about the need for new regulation. The FCC really isn't equipped to handle this kind of thing.
Acting != make believe. The dude was hamming it up to the point that he seemed like a caricature of a product announcement.
They don't need a breakneck GPU - they need a device like this that gives them new, intuitive input options.
That said, for any kind of 3D development this hardware isn't up to snuff. Anyway, the device seems more targeted at 2D graphic designers.
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: JS, Python, PHP, HTML5, CSS, Canvas animation, LAMP, bash.
Resume: http://registry.jsonresume.org/ryanbateman
Email: rybateman@gmail.com
And to piggyback on your comment, modern academic science is the way it is because their "investors" (i.e. granting institutions like NSF) have certain stipulations for grant funds or at the very least prefer certain applications over others. Applications that have some aspect dealing with STEM education, for example, are incredibly popular with NSF and other institutions at the moment.
When you talk to research academics in the sciences, they often complain about what a burden education and outreach are on their time. Most of them would rather spend 100% of the time on their research. However, their public sector "investors" have an agenda for how their money is spent. They want to see certain results - it's not just enough to see more sea slug research, they want to have grantees also encourage STEM education growth.
Don't worry, though - it'll be at least another 10 years or so until Gates starts sending his cronies out at night to black-bag folks into compulsory humanitarian aid work.
You passively pay for security at a bar when you buy a drink - the price of the bouncer is part of how they derive the cost of your beer. Similarly you pay taxes (local, state, federal) that pay for a massive amount of physical security that you utilize unknowingly on a day to day basis.
Just because you don't find it necessary to lock up your stuff in your driveway doesn't mean that you can claim that you don't use or pay for physical security.