292 karma · joined May 4, 2023
What you say is correct - the laws as they stand do allow for this behavior by BMW, and the company is correct when they say that (buyers? renters?) don't own the gadget in question.
It's also true that a discussion around preventing this sort of behavior with new laws is probably warranted.
Nice selection, too. Nature's engineer.
There's no irony or shame in their presentation, they are upfront about their motive to educate. Despite that, they were very popular and widely quoted.
Some ones that stuck in my mind:
https://www.historicacanada.ca/productions/minutes/jacques-c...
https://www.historicacanada.ca/productions/minutes/inukshuk
https://www.historicacanada.ca/productions/minutes/agnes-mac...
https://www.historicacanada.ca/productions/minutes/john-mccr...
https://www.historicacanada.ca/productions/minutes/sitting-b...
https://www.historicacanada.ca/productions/minutes/halifax-e...
Good to know. FWIW i should also be avoided. It's tempting to use, since most programs use it as a counter, so it /should/ standardize the logfilesizes. But in practice it's very tricky to get a definitive disk space requirement with it.
- a keychain sized measuring tape I got as conference swag years ago
- a geologists’ hand lens. I’m not a geologist but it is useful on rare occasions when you need to see really small things. Though to be honest the phone camera magnification mode probably obsoletes it.
moot?
Headline in The Grauniad is wrong.
[0] https://youtu.be/kqTR0mrIIEc?t=2676
(The entire lecture and Q&A in that video is quite good).
A grand place to be!
On board HMS Majesty
For nukes a tour or' sea
What kind of men are we?
Who fly 'bove the floor?
Hardy! and Strong!
and Work all day long!
and Sing a sweet song
when we come back to thee.
*Of course, the effect is greatly reduced if you see a tourist sample plate that someone bought, with all zeros. That just means the person's been there. Far more impressive if the car's been there.
> the same depressing crumbling economy of coastal towns all over the UK
I'm surprised to hear that coastal towns in the UK are doing poorly. In North America, it's generally the coastal areas that are more prosperous.
Was it overbuilding during the era of British sea power? Or a great sucking-up of wealth by London?
It makes me wonder if, long term, seaside areas would make good places to buy property. Surely, on the whole, they have more natural beauty than inland areas.
That was fine for a few centuries, until external enemies re-emerged, and then it really fell apart.
- General Hayden
They're not completely to blame; the hordes of people who claim their 'passion' is analyzing widget sales or what have you share some of it. Going along with what are essentially lies about motivations to fit in with the perceived trends of the crowd is understandable (people want to get and keep jobs), but still immoral. And, n=1, but in my experience, it isn't actually necessary.
There are different types of debating, which may cloud the question; debating once or twice a year on a single prepared topic may be less informative for participants. Debating dozens of times a year on an active team is an entirely different experience. I would not be surprised at all if debate team participation has significant overlap with the rhetoric taught to students in ancient times.
Debating is an object lesson for the participants in how one can find (or should at least be able to find, if you're a good debater) arguments in favour of either side of any given issue.
Debating, especially impromptu debating, teaches quick thinking. It also teaches an ability to empathize with people on any side of an argument - you know, from experience after debating, that one can make good arguments in favour of an arbitrary side of a topic. You regularly work through points of view that you may not personally hold.
It's been said that math is learned at the end of a pencil - you learn it by working through it. Debating is the same - you learn empathy and understanding with points of view other than your own by working through them yourself.
Edit: all of this is from my experience in parliamentary debating eons ago. Things may have changed, if - as the article suggests - people can win without arguing the actual question they were given.
No, because it's an active rather than passive light sensor, it works in the dark.
Edit: also, the fact that you can see a green dot heavily implies the sensor is operating in the green wavelengths, not in the infrared, but that's secondary.