pinkcan

Where should they be, and why?

lisp is from the 60s

python is from 91

virustotal says it's good: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/48fe6cd5ef2cb9779db5bf16...

Wouldn't that be too obvious, wouldn't it be better to plan bogus info elsewhere, especially for and org capable of doing so?

Wouldn't it be dangerous to publish bogus info that can be picked up by nationals and allies, especially since it is branded?

I think it's fine like this as it facilitates people finding other docs in their collections.

Without understanding OPs reason to share this link it's hard to make a call on that.

It says in the PDF: 2009

I understand this document is from 2009, not secret, and probably contains information known elsewhere.

Still, what is the intent of the CIA in publishing this on the open web? I assume they would be able to distribute this to US nationals even in other orgs through internal networks.

AFAIK these are also weird orgs of the cooperative type. Each having over 2 million members probably helps keep the prices sane.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migros

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coop_(Switzerland)

it's a toy targeted at people with enough disposable income to afford it

i own one, it's setting in a shelf

what do you use the cpu cores for on a threadripper, is it work that any of the other computing units available on this chip can do?

every half year or so I remember centrifuge, and get a little sad they didn't write more about it

lol, don't be naive

bart is only being made public because openai did a thing

It's a ceremony, it's ego stroking.

it's no longer a native app

cold water, but it gets warmer over time

ChatGPT scales better than "demagogues", so it does have more than a "little practical difference".

there was a bug on our codebase...

It's called ART - Automatic multi-step Reasoning and Tool-use

https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.09014

seriously? you're being disingenuous

codex being in beta meant it was improving, not that it'd vanish overnight.

it's not about "getting what they pay for," it's about showing some respect to users who trusted the service.

if you really wanted to write about it, you could have just avoided referring to the corp name at all, tos and ndas, and just write about the technical details of this script. you could even have done so under a throwaway.

uk is not in the eu anymore?

I'm worried about the author. Who forced them?

yea ok, but what happens when chatgpt can search for you?

the fact it is being done to people who are being laid off shows it's not just a retention mechanism

meh, you're writing comes of as defensive

if you still have money tied up in crypto you can still try and sell it

docker compose is like using cheat codes

iOS "focus" and "screen time" features

reader mode?

for proper context you'd have to look at the repo has it was when the tweets went out

https://github.com/harthur/replace/tree/431b1e183a4bd43046af...

but it doesn't matter as those tweets are trash, specially coming from other OSS devs

"rewrite in Rust for no good reason"

`sudo` just had an array-out-of-bounds CVE https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-4399...