petterroea

If they are getting regulated to death they may as well bring the rest of the industry down with them, probably

Frankly, considering this is a laptop, I wish they spent more effort on delivering a flush 1gbe module rather than a 10gbe module. It has become an elephant in the room every time someone asks about my framework laptop. It... sticks out like a sore thumb, per say.

Oh yeah. Strategic disruption technique or not its a breath of fresh air.

China aren't offering a cheaper solution. They are subsidizing an existing one (which is already subsidized) in order to gain foothold. The difference is that in the US subsidies come from VC, while OP implies subsidies come from the AI labs that buy the training data (which may as well also be VC backed, so just one extra hop).

This isn't "the market working as intended", this is an exhaustion fight to the bottom where the one with most money gets to stay in the market. As with most venture capital startups. I believe this VC tactic is a well documented "cheat code" to bypass market forces and build a monopoly. I find it hard to compare that with a free market.

However, I don't really mind China "stealing" from Anthropic. For us consumers we are getting the cake and eating it too. I.e we are getting rapid improvement to the tune of over a hundred billion dollars in funding, yet the market remains big enough that there's a chance of it not ending up as a monopoly in 20 years. And venture capital are footing the bill. A part of their investment is practically being redirected to fund Chinese AI development. It lets us live out our lives as happy CAC farmers[1].

So I would argue its not as much of a "cheaper solution" as it is intentionally and maliciously abusing another company's product to extract more value than the billing plans intend (given an average user), and further subsidizing the product by selling this data to competitors. But I don't necessarily think its a bad thing for us end-users. Nor for the market. But it is bad for Anthropic and its investors.

[1]: https://phrack.org/issues/71/17

Living in Japan, most popular concerts are handled this way. It really really sucks to not get a ticket, and it sucks even more that we need to do it this way because of scalpers. But hey, if it means I overall have a better chance of getting tickets (at list price at that), hey, I guess it is worth it.

I wish there were better ways of defeating scalpers.

I can't decide if this is a "techbro doesn't understand human factors" post or not, especially considering geohots reputation.

I do believe it is possible Anthropic are legitimately trying to start political discourse, but if they are they are either sacrificing themselves on purpose or shooting themselves in the foot. Others in the comments here are pointing out that there are many incentives for them to get into politics. Maybe they see possible outcomes worth the short term problems.

If it is just marketing and FUD, it's worth considering that a good lie is usually based in truth.

Let's say Anthropic were a "hippie organisation willing to sacrifice revenue for morals" (or pick your own, I'm just giving an example). Could they play the politics game better?

Immediately the wallpaper looks AI generated, and for me that immediately removes any trust in "graphic design" and "attention to detail. But the rest is cool

Am I the only one who feels Boston completely missed their chance and fell behind by being slow on selling robot dogs?

Chinese companies were quick to jump in and fill that unfulfilled demand. I work with robots and have never seen a Boston machine irl. Tonnes of Chinese though

I personally know other people who have filed similar complaints, and the Norwegian Datatilsynet explicitly stated they acted based on many complaints. I don't think they care about a single person's voice in this, even if they "helped create the law".

It's a shame, but it probably says more about Datatilsynet's capacity. Frankly it would be great if you could simply say "this company did something dodgy", provide proof, and immediately get results. But that's not the world we live in.

Part of the problem is that even if you did a good job it doesn't really matter because the rest of the industry isn't, so no user wants to give you a chance

This should be obvious but why would you trust what the spade seller says about being an AI-native startup.

Even if you believe AI-native startup is the future (the comments are divided), you would at least want to hear from an impartial source.

This is just marketing material.

That's good for you but the demand is so low SpaceX is leasing a considerable amount of its compute to Google and Anthropic to compensate. Regardless of whether it is useful, it is clearly not popular

I just don't see the average consumer ever needing more than 10gbit. In fact, I can tell you right away most consumers wouldn't notice if they were running 500mbit vs 1gbit.

4G has been enough for a decade, 5G was mostly just an infrastructure and capacity improvement and most consumers could never tell you they notice a difference between the two. The human eye can only see so much resolution, we don't need 8k video. I don't think consumers will need more than what they already have. At least until some new novel media format that gulps down bandwidth comes around.

This isn't necessarily all bad news. There is still a push for higher bandwidth for datacenters etc, which will keep pushing technology forward, hopefully making consumer and ISP grade equipment cheaper.

If I built a house I'd probably run ethernet. Maybe play around with a 10gbe core network. But it wouldn't really give me any benefit, it's not like disks are that fast anyways.

to be fair "nobody" is using grok either

Working with k8s myself I'm somewhere in between you and the article on opinion. I think k8s is good when you can afford to hire a person dedicated to managing it (or at least find someone with experience in running it that can make it part of their MO)

That is, k8s is probably best considered when you are beginning to consider having an infrastructure department, or if one of your early hires knows Kubernetes and is opinionated in a way that is less "throw cool and complex stuff at the wall"* and more "the 5 things I want in a k8s cluster that I don't want to spend much time on and should just work"

My understanding of the 2000s and 2010s was that there was a big focus on inventing self service deployment systems for developers, and k8s is that solution(!), for the same scale that would begin considering re-inventing the wheel internally anyways

Vibecoded website with poor UX. Loving that the website is both trying to be fancy by having a floating player you can drag around with a playlist, while also wiping everything if you click the wrong link. No human made this, or paid it any attention at least.

Sadly non technical people do not see future risk and any warning prediction is a slippery slope fallacy. Yet we now hear the echo of privacy advocates of the 2000s and 2010s saying "I told you so!"

This shouldn't be a surprise. But at this point it feels like if you don't completely avoid participating in digital society, your data will be used against you or groups/countries you support.

I found it very ironic that this article, which in practice is trying to solicit customers, is both talking about a fundamental weakness of LLM while also trying to sell AI consultation. In reality as many have said here you cannot have untrusted data in the context. There isn't that much more to say.

Prompt injection is XXS without possibility of sanitation. There is no absolute cure.

I totally believe you that people inside have asked. I think part of the problem is that the people actually making the decisions higher up do not care and aren't really invested in these issues.

To the point that some guy vibecoding for a bit and deciding it was fun had more effect on the company's ability to open up an abandoned product than an entire consumer movement that has been lurking in the zeitgeist for ages.

as other has said, it is sad that it took that a CTO had fun to open it up, and not the rest of the public discourse about things like this.

I'm happy he had fun and all for him making decisions based on it. But it shouldn't have taken this.

I feel like this is reducing the problem to a simpler one. Of course you'd expert larger product decisions to be made by a technical leader. The problem here is that devices being locked down is something being fought against, repairability is a big topic for discussion, and some companies even try to play into it pretty hard, like Framework and seemingly Valve.

Yet, to this Meta CTO, this wasn't really a concern until he vibecoded something and decided everyone should be able to have this fun. It say's something about his (and probably other people in his position) awareness of public opinion and discussion.

Even sadder. Turns out all we needed to not have our old devices locked down was the CTO having some fun

It is sad that it takes a Meta developer having some fun to realize they should open up ADB.

This isn't the repairability and reuseability of old devices mindset people have been begging for. This is some guy using internal privileges to having some fun, and deciding the rest of us should get a piece of the fun as well.

This is a "happy story" in the same way it is a "happy story" when some kid successfully fundraises a classmate's cancer treatment because the healthcare system neglects them.

Meta are making the glasses something you could be punched for wearing.

I live in a big city and I love it because i feel anonymous - nobody cares who I am. It's a stark contrast to where I grew up, where if you were out in public with someone unusual you could hear about it at school the next day.

I think the age of anonymity in public is getting to a close. First government mass surveillance and now private mass surveillance (which will surely be funneled into government surveillance over time)

Github-based spam has always been a problem but it feels like in recent months it has become worse. I keep getting e-mails about being "hand-picked" for new exciting jobhunting platforms - the e-mails of course are styled just like any page you get when you ask claude to "make me a moden html + css webpage".

The worst part of hustle culture is that what I believe to be 99% of the noise is:

* Stupid things that will never succeed

* From ignorant people just trying to make a quick buck, whom I want no involvement in

Nobody believes in your "spam every github e-mail account" jobhunting site. Thousands have spammed before you. You are nothing but noise.

They are probably counting every single http request rejection as an evil bot

Now imagine OpenRouter but for free support bots.

This is a somewhat unpopular opinion but I find it depressing that this is what the so-called elite FAANG engineers are able to come up with.

Or maybe even more sad, this is what a FAANG product manager is able to pass through layers of "are you mad"

haha i sure hope it's the newest Windows which is the most <good thing>