298 karma · joined February 12, 2011
Tell me in no uncertain terms that you won't ever manually view the urls, won't ever manually view the page snapshots, and won't ever publish that individual data without having all parties involved agree to the same terms.
(Yes, they do provide some scaled downloads that appear to be designed for using as a desktop background. The highest resolution is only 3000x5000 though)
The ratio of females to males is about 1.6
Average age is 27
Top ten email address domains:
yahoo.com (24269 addresses)
gmail.com (17805 addresses)
hotmail.com (7518 addresses)
aol.com (7129 addresses)
comcast.net (1639 addresses)
live.com (1177 addresses)
msn.com (1079 addresses)
sbcglobal.net (992 addresses)
ymail.com (781 addresses)
aim.com (698 addresses)
There's a lot more I want to graph and look at though. I especially want to see how different demographics pick different email providers. That and getting a map for zip-codes and making a heatmap of the applicants' locations then subtracting that from a population density map.(Edit: This is incorrect. See comments.)
See http://chargen.matasano.com/chargen/2007/9/7/enough-with-the... and http://codahale.com/how-to-safely-store-a-password/
Meta discussion aside, I think the base64 export is a really cool feature in a webapp that otherwise is simply MS Paint.
Also check http://news.ycombinator.com/jobs, and http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2396027.
Package management is nowhere near 'only necessary if apps share dependencies'. Compare:
1) Search google for software. 2) Search software website for download link. 3) Download. 4) Go to folder it was downloaded to. 5) Run installer. 6) Click next five times.
The same situation, but with package management: 1) Type in a single command and watch it install exactly what you want, quickly. eg: `pacman -S firefox`
Is there a specific reason why your startup cannot work in the Chilean (or Italian? Are you in Italy?) market?
Central standard system for software configuration.
This would be similar to the Windows registry but with larger scope. Every setting of any software would be configurable here by users. No nonstandard config files. No trying to find config files everywhere, etc. The Windows registry is only used by some programs, and in my opinion, is not at all user friendly.
This would apply to the control panel and internal settings as well. The current control panel has many different inconsistent styles for dialogs and configuration screens and can be tough to learn and tough to know where to find some things intuitively (eg: to restart your network you have to go through a 'network adapters' page).
Package Management
Windows has made strides with Windows Update, Add and Remove Programs, and standard installers, but there is a long way it could go to entirely streamlining this.
If you didn't catch it, it was a redirect to http://rubyonrails.org/download
"Does the server note when the same user makes a second request (in firefox, at least, 'view source' makes another http request, even if you have already loaded the page) and then only provide half the page?"
"Wait. Why is my scroll-bar so long..."