The contract I signed, had a clause that said if they had to move me somewhere else, they would pay all costs of doing so. I don't know how standard a clause this is.
2,377 karma · joined September 25, 2009
The contract I signed, had a clause that said if they had to move me somewhere else, they would pay all costs of doing so. I don't know how standard a clause this is.
I read the article, they do say "colocation"; besides which, XO Communications does not rent servers as far as I know. So that seems to point that they were renting the physical space that their servers are in.
Would it make a difference if they were just renting a partial rack, or a full rack that goes all the way down to the floor and is enclosed? I don't know ...
If you rent an apartment, even though you don't own the building, you have "rights of tenant in possession". Basically the apartment is "yours" and you have rights. If a search warrant is to be served to search your place, it gets served on YOU, not the owner of the buildng.
If you rent server space, like a rack in a datacenter, that space is "yours". So should the search warrant have been honored?
He compares Oracle to a lawnmower - if you stick your hand in a mower, it will cut your hand off.
Oracle is simple in the way that a mower is simple - a mower cuts what is put in front of the blade. Oracle wants money from whoever they can get it from.
Second, Oracle is encumbering Solaris with a not-nice license. I haven't followed the latest developments because I no longer care, since I will never use a non-free OS.
Whether you meant to ask, "Why Illumos over Solaris" or "Why SmartOS or OmniOS over Illumos?" I think I have answered your question :-)
People who want to run ZFS for storage usage. ZFS is still better than Linux alternatives like LVM, BTRFS etc. To be picky, there is not an exact counterpart to ZFS under Linux.
And with clones etc. you can set up 1 master KVM image and then clone it 10 or 100 times, saving a lot of disk space in the process (ZFS clones only use the amount of space that is different from the original).
People who have a lot of Solaris experience or have to maintain a lot of Solaris systems already. Also people who are using Solaris zones.
People who are building backend systems that require or can use any/all of the above. Right now, no one cares what your Web SaaS service runs on, as long as it stays up and doesn't lose their data.
Solaris still has a better VM subsystem, IMHO, than Linux does, and performs very well under heavy loads that include disk activity.
This one does, according to release notes.
Looks like they have tweaked some of the libraries and they provide both 32 and 64bit versions of Python also (this can be a pain to build sometimes as the configure tools don't always pull in the right libs, so you end up with mixed 32 and 64bit objects or other weirdness).
Also, the installer is minimal, basically just asks you what disk to install on. You do all other configuration after you have booted it for the first time.
Free Jon Corzine! Oh, nevermind...
BTW, Univac (I believe) got their start issuing stock in exactly this fashion. You could buy a share for either $1 or $5.
The NYT is shrinking, Instagram is growing - that too, matters.
How many weeks has it been since this came to light?
How about Roman and Byzantine (Costantinople) cities, where bread was distributed for free each day to every one in the city?
And both Rome and Byzantium suffered large population declines during some of their history.
Other counter-examples include medieval Europe, where average life expectancy was 60+ and they worked less hours than present-day Americans.
The problem with installation, was that all development was done on PS/2s. The developers never did much testing on non-MCA (MicroChannel Architecture, a pre-PCI intelligent bus design) hardware.
That is why, for instance, when installing OS.2 2.0 and 2.1 on certain PCs you had to disable the CPUs L2 cache by using the legacy "non-turbo" mode and do part of the installation in 8Mhz AT mode; otherwise the installer would crash and you wouldn't know why.
I think a lot of OS/2 users went to Linux and their disgust for MS' admitted astro-turfing and plain outright lying, fueled Linux adoption.
ADD: OS/2 ran well in 32MB and flew in anything more than that. Unfortunately at that time, 32MB was hundreds of dollars, and some systems couldn't even take that much RAM.
The articles are well written, and if covering pre-20th century history, literature, or other topics, should still be excellent introductions.
Would this not serve to reduce future demand, since obviously, graduating doesn't necessarily result in better job prospects.