2,377 karma · joined September 25, 2009
On a nearly-identical XenServer instance, it shows the same info, showing 2 CPUs but identifying the CPU as a 6-core Opteron.
From this, however, you cannot infer what percentage of those 2 virtual CPUs that you are going to get.
You could walk for quite some time and never be at ground level. Most people can walk 1 km extra per day and never notice losing any time, given the savings in waiting for transit or getting into and out of a car.
We do not understand even the basics. For instance, we do not fully understand how the Gulf Stream works.
The problem is that we can't just sum or multiply the uncertainty values and try to arrive at a consensus.
Perhaps an analogy can be made to trying to model the US or Europe's financial system - clearly even the largest banks, spending large amounts of money on IT systems and modeling over the past number of years, have grossly mis-calculated things. And the financial world is arguably less dynamic than Earth's climate system.
The fastest Cray in 1990 could do (I think) 60 GFlops when loaded with 32 processors, which is roughly the sustained GFlops as a high end i7.
So clearly it is not a case of "just need a faster supercomputer and we will have an accurate prediction".
Reality is, from what I can tell, is that we don't have an accurate mathematical model of all the pieces that go into global climate to run on a supercomputer, no matter how powerful. ===
No one challenged me and I got several upvotes and follow-on posts in agreement. link: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4761364
Did something change in the meantime?
Is it just me, or does this kind of stuff scream "the system itself, allows massive fraud to occur" ?
See e.g. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-11-08/apple-enters-gravti...
Note: VWAP means "volume weighted average price" and ES refers to contracts that track the price of the S&P 500 : http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/equity-index/us-index/e-mini...
Plus all the illegals who are not supposed to vote (but it is reasonable to assume that some small percentage of them do).
Germany during the WWII era was able to produce 75% of their oil needs due to synfuels. Once the plants were bombed or disrupted, Germany ran out of fuel and lost the war.
"There has to be at least one unique feature. I suggest some sort of projection display that allows you to project (for maybe 5 seconds at a time) what is on your screen to any reasonably flat surface like a wall. This would allow you to show your buddy or boss a document or a picture. An inexpensive LED bulb or two plus the ability to project 640×480 if that, is all that is needed."
Comment #6, here: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2005/09/23/could-a-mobile...
Meaning the libertarian section of the Republican base, not meaning the people who necessarily voted for Gary Johnson.
If there were other factors that were found in the USA but not found in other countries (whatever that may be, environmental or otherwise) then there would be statistically significant divergence.
If you look at Ohio, Florida, and Virginia (I am going from memory here) - the votes gotten by the libertarian candidate represented a large portion of votes needed to swing the state to Romney. And those 3 states' EC votes would have put Romney a lot closer, giving him 266 EC votes. Add in Colorado (numbers below) and he would have won.
Florida: 29EC votes; difference was 61,000 votes, L. got 44,000 votes
Ohio: 18E votes: difference was 104,000 votes, L got 47,000
Virginia: 13EC votes: difference was 116,000, L and Constitution parties got 44,000 .
Colorado: 9EC votes: difference was 113,000, L and Constitution got 37,000 .
Clausewitz, in his treatise "On War" dedicates an entire chapter to "Moral Forces" , what we would term "an organization's morale" .
Did crappy software contribute? Perhaps.
But wars and elections are not won by software, but by people.
That critical Libertarian slice or whatever you want to call it, of the traditional Republican base, was demoralized over Ron Paul and that resulted in an Obama victory.
Description of rule changes at RNC convention: http://articles.latimes.com/2012/aug/28/news/la-pn-ron-paul-...
My solution is a lot simpler: I cut ketchup out of my diet.
The fastest Cray in 1990 could do (I think) 60 GFlops when loaded with 32 processors, which is roughly the sustained GFlops as a high end i7.
So clearly it is not a case of "just need a faster supercomputer and we will have an accurate prediction".
Reality is, from what I can tell, is that we don't have an accurate mathematical model of all the pieces that go into global climate to run on a supercomputer, no matter how powerful.
The idea was to allow Germany and Russia to slug it out, completely exhausting both countries.
See for example the views of Charles Lindbergh (search for Russia) : http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/lindbergh/sfeature/fallen.html
America's strength is why the USD became the reserve currency of the world. Note that the Bretton Woods conference was held in 1944, before the war ended: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system