273 karma · joined May 7, 2018
Look what happened to:
1. Gawker
2. The Awl and The Hairpin
2. PolicyMic
3. Vice subsidiaries like Refinery29
It's funny, all these places tried to reinvent the tech stack too. I remember Medium being a clojure shop
Surely, they're not 'overstaffed'
It's completely not comparable to a CEO hired with no initial equity stake.
Just for illustration. The 10% stock price jump this message caused just earned him $500+ million
[0]https://www.orau.org/health-physics-museum/collection/consum...
BULLISH for GOOGL
It's crazy how a company the size of Alphabet still embraces these reflexive whims.
What a drop! M1 success and exodus out of butterfly keyboard probably pumped those numbers last year, but I guess we know the trend of growth there is on shaky ground.
Also, i wonder how much of that are companies not needing to buy new hires new laptops
My friend in the federal gov found your application details very curious.
>Several of you have reached out asking why we don’t support certain platforms (including PayPal and Venmo) natively in FUNDING.yml, the file for configuring a “Sponsor” button on a repo. Great question!
>We decided to leave PayPal, Venmo, and others out of the set of supported platforms because there is a less explicit social contract for where the money is going compared to platforms like Patreon, Open Collective, Tidelift, and Community Bridge, to name a few of the platforms we do support. Those are community, creator, open source, or developer-focused—and they make it clear that you are supporting the work of the person or team developing code in that repository.
>We support custom fields so we can monitor funding methods we might not have known about, and iterate accordingly. Good news is you can put PayPal—or any other link—in the custom field, too.
Makes me wonder how many of these are IT employees and what type of system they have in place. Do they borrow a secure system from another agency? Or do they just pass around google docs?
Look at this:
https://github.com/Shopify/cli/blob/main/package.json
but wait...this too:
https://github.com/Shopify/cli/blob/main/packages/app/packag...
https://github.com/Shopify/cli/blob/main/packages/cli-hydrog...
https://github.com/Shopify/cli/blob/main/packages/cli/packag...
https://github.com/Shopify/cli/blob/main/packages/create-app...
etc, etc, etc
VS
https://github.com/Shopify/shopify-cli/blob/main/Gemfile
What am i missing? Why do you have to rely on all that junk to run a CLI? It feels like people choose Node because creating a Rube Goldberg machine creates job security.
Literally all you can eat + pasta. Dirt cheap. If you're the 'one-meal-a-day' type, is there a cheaper option?
I guess we now know if Satya Nadella is a prude or not
[0]https://nypost.com/2013/06/30/mta-hasnt-purchased-a-hybrid-b...
[1]https://www.timeout.com/newyork/news/200-electric-buses-are-...
Now they're cutting R&D to focus on pushing their barely used, mediocre service. Doesn't seem like they have a bright future.
It's probably just following a pattern it has discovered via machine learning.
Interviewing community members is post-breaking.
Also, curious the assumptions of what it is allowed to do (i.e. generate fake interviews), when not prompted to do so. It's possible it has no understanding of what an interview actually is, and is just following a general format, without properly vetting individual components.
I'm sure there is a solution to better solve these 'problems' that pop up but not something high on the list for most places to pursue.
Mbappe a contender. Just needs to win 2 out of the next 3
I don't find it to be egregious