paradoja

It seems so, but I guess it'll be difficult to fine businesses without presence in Spain.

I'm not him, but I can try to answer you.

It applies to any businesses, professionals with a web page, and anyone who offers a service as long as they a) are located in Spain, b) target their services to the Spanish market or c) if they have a (permanent or regular) workplace or facilities in Spain.

(It's a translation from Spanish legalese, so probably the language is muddled, sorry.)

Who died? Is there any evidence of that?

This article http://www.thenation.com/blog/174622/seven-myths-about-bradl... (in the myth #5) shows some evidence, in fact, of the opposite.

Even the military finds no deaths from the leaks: http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/07/31/59869.htm

I don't think it is. It seems pretty clear you misunderstood. As posted in another comment, this Tweet shows that The Guardian destroyed the hard drives at the government's behest: https://twitter.com/dansabbagh/status/369794535464767488

This may be near your wishes: http://docs.racket-lang.org/ts-guide/

I think maybe you misunderstood what the language does. It is compiled not to Haskell itself, but to the type system. No Haskell code is executed when using the interpreter (well, apart from the interpreter's itself), but it is Haskell's types that are... executed? checked? It's as is you made a program using C++ templates, not C++.

Here you have some examples (although it requires some knowledge of Haskell): http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Type_arithmetic

> is only important in the US

It may not be important everywhere, but there are other places where the origin of evidence is indeed important (e.g. Spain, in the EU). Just because in Austria it isn't you can't conclude that it's only important in the US.

Calling it property is considered a misnomer by many (eg http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2008/feb/21/intellectu... ) and in fact, in certain jurisdictions, there are certain intellectual property rights that cannot be lost by the creator ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_rights_%28copyright_law%... ).

Reasonable people do usually get in arguments (and are wrong) over the Monty Hall problem even when the problem is correctly stated (as the Vos Savant or Erdős' stories show).

I guess you have a little error in your code. Maybe if you copied and pasted there was an error.

For example, if you have

     let people :: [Person] people

instead of

     let people :: [Person]
         people = -- ...

that would give you that error.

It doesn't seem to be outdated. I guess you probably didn't follow correctly the instructions (or maybe they aren't explained well). The extra code given in the second example goes just after the code in the first example, starting with the same indentation. Something like:

    main = do 
      putStr "Hello World! Let's have a picnic! \n"
      people_text <- readFile "people.txt"
      -- ... the rest

At one point you can build a steelworks and produce steel from iron and coal.

Being left or right has nothing to do to being statist or not.

It is not clear at all. That version is heavily disputed, and reflects only official US Government's view.

> Nothing like real data. The US has over three times more immigrants than any other country.

That doesn't take into account the population of the US. Relative to other countries, the US does have lots of foreign-born population, but is far from being the one with more immigrants.

Firing costs in Spain are lower than in Germany: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/spain/firing-cost-weeks-of-w...

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/germany/firing-cost-weeks-of...

Yes.

And that has no relation with what we are talking about. If the Swiss government doesn't follow the written rules of the agreement, it is in violation of them. Saying so doesn't make one a lier.

If you read other comments in this thread by swedish people, they tell that other companies already do that.

It is not.

One side may have no doubt it is a violation of the agreement, and say so. There is no problem with that.

> I'm completely against the policy, but it's not a violation of the agreement.

That is not clear. EU officials say that it is indeed a violation of the agreement: “The measures adopted today by the Swiss government are contrary to the agreement on the Free Movement of Persons, since they differentiate between groups of member states.”

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9f70bc54-ad0c-11e2-9454-00144feabd...

Taiwan is oficially the Republic of _China_, so I doubt they would take offense with that.

0 evaluates to true in Ruby. Only nil and false evaluate to false in Ruby, so it'd work as intended.

It's a package manager for Common Lisp.

No he is not. He is accused.

Yes there is.

Could you name one major scientific institution related to climate science that dispute anthropogenic climate change?

Actually, romans were usually tolerant of other religions. Yes, some religions were persecuted, but that was usually due to political reasons. Many (most?) christians were persecuted not for not following official religion but for creating unrest and speaking against Rome.

Surely? Any sources?

Certainly not what you asked for, but maybe you'll be interested in this: http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicm/ .

Mhhh, don't know when: Haskell

  printf "%10.2f" x

(Note the lack of parenthesis or commas)