1,032 karma · joined August 16, 2022
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerontocracy
A gerontocracy is a form of oligarchical rule in which an entity is ruled by leaders who are significantly older than most of the adult population.
In some cases you won't know until decades later, when one of those videos becomes "lost media" and people start looking for it.
That's why, as long as people are willing to buy hard drives to store everything, we should let them save as much as they want for the future. Because you never know.
Serious question, what is the path for a linter? Where else are people paying for linting as a service?
> Microsoft Office rewrite in React.js nears completion
Seems like even Microsoft is hedging their bets when it comes to Windows.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/02/gary-gensler-on-meet...
> “Everything other than bitcoin,” Gensler told me, “you can find a website, you can find a group of entrepreneurs, they might set up their legal entities in a tax haven offshore, they might have a foundation, they might lawyer it up to try to arbitrage and make it hard jurisdictionally or so forth.” In other words, there are people behind these cryptocurrencies using a variety of complex and legally opaque mechanisms, but at the most basic level, they are trying to promote their tokens and entice investors. (Bitcoin, because of its unique history and creation story, is fundamentally different from other crypto projects in this respect.)
https://cryptoslate.com/sec-chair-gensler-confirms-everythin...
Is that not a clear enough answer? I'm not saying Coinbase has to agree - but there's no way they didn't know he said this.
https://cryptoslate.com/sec-chair-gensler-confirms-everythin...
I'm not saying Coinbase has to agree with that decision, but it's a little silly they're posturing to the public like they're unaware. It's not exactly a secret.
If they disagree then going to court is probably their only move.
Sure they could offer a sideloadable app on their website somewhere, but nobody will find it or use it. If your grandma searches for facebook and the top result says "Friendly for Facebook" instead of just "Facebook", do you really think she'll notice the difference let alone go on a wild goose chase of googling for alternative app stores and clicking through scary warnings?
Meanwhile:
https://www.chase.com/personal/savings/savings-account/inter...
0.01% interest rate
They're still better off keeping rates low and shafting the 92% of customers who stayed behind. I think too many people are permanently un-savvy for the market to ever truly be competitive.
I'm aware of ab_glyph, used by e.g. https://www.egui.rs/ but it looks noticeably non-native to my eyes. For one there seems to be no hinting. So text ends up blurry at 96dpi, and since a glyph stroke is thinner than a pixel the text always appears slightly faded, never able to reach fully black or white.
I wish these libraries would just use native APIs on each platform to render text, then all these problems would already be solved by the OS/browser. Though I'm not sure if the web has good APIs for that.
Maybe there's something better in Rust these days that I missed?
Once upon a time Microsoft wasn't afraid to stand up to corporate-sponsored malware. https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-will-wipe-sonys-root...
I guess that's changed?
The current international agreement is (best I can tell) UNITED NATlONS: GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION AND PRINCIPLES RELEVANT TO THE USE OF NUCLEAR POWER SOURCES IN OUTER SPACE [December 14, 1992]
https://csps.aerospace.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/Princ...
I only skimmed, but it says this:
> In order to mlnlmlze the quantity of radioactLve materzal in space and the risks Involved, the use of nuclear power sources in outer space shall be restrxcted to those space mLssions which cannot be operated by non-nuclear energy sources in a reasonable way.
and
> (a) Nuclear reactors may be operated: (i) On interplanetary missions; (ii) In sufficiently high orbits as defined in paragraph 2 (h); (iii) In low-Earth orbits if they are stored in sufficiently high orbits after the operational part of their mission.
So it seems like nuclear reactors are restricted, but not completely banned. For an interplanetary mission to Jupiter, it would probably be allowed.
(Not hating on Rogan, just listen to any real clip and you'll see what I mean, e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvswhogSiY0)
EDIT: I listened longer and the AI actually is throwing in some "uhh"s and pauses. They don't sound completely naturally but it's still really impressive
Who is liable if you tweak the software on your 2023 Mercedes? The same person who is liable if you tweak the hardware on your 1987 Chevy. There's plenty of precedent on how to deal with this.
But sure, I guess they could try.
Is it a security? A commodity? I don't know! But neither does the US government. The CFTC and SEC are fighting a turf war. The CFTC calls them commodities. The SEC calls (most of) them securities. The IRS has created a brand new category called "digital assets". Who is right? If the government can't tell you, I sure can't.
I can infer there must be some legal justification for the current treatment. Even if you think Coinbase is playing fast and loose with the law, the old school players like Fidelity also don't charge sales tax on bitcoin, and I guarantee you they're not going to risk their core business over crypto. I am curious now how their lawyers would answer some of your questions.
Anyways it's been an interesting conversation, thanks for sticking around after the thread died. You've given me some stuff to think about.
Doubt that. All that would happen is driving the industry underground or overseas. It wouldn't be the first time a government overplayed its hand and failed to acknowledge that bitcoin is a global technology.
https://data.nasdaq.com/data/BCHAIN/HRATE-bitcoin-hash-rate
That isn't slowing down. I have exactly 0 faith that governments across the world could start from scratch and cooperate to outpace and then surpass the private sector in a chip fabrication project, no matter how many billions they throw at it.
Either way less spending sounds good to me. We could use a world with more saving and less consumerism.