osti

Somehow regresses on SWE bench?

Social "science" be social science.

I saw many complaints about assetto corsa evo early access about the slow pace of development after EA release. So I'm not sure if I wanna "beta test" this one.

That's why reading comments about geopolitics on the Internet is largely useless. Big news! A country's population supports its own country on international stage! If you go on Chinese social media, it'll be mostly about how awful the Americans are, and vice versa if you are on Reddit for example. So what is even the point of reading them, anywhere..

Look at IXUS or VEU for example, in the past 5-10 years, or even longer, they have significantly underperformed US indices.

Yeah, and those have underpermed historically and it's definitely not recommended by most people.

That's the biggest problem I have with the recommendation to buy indices as if indices grow at >8% annually is an natural law.

Many (most) indices of countries in the world performed way less than 8%. US performed exceptionally well over almost a century so people are starting to take it as a natural law. If I buy US index, I'm still putting a directional bet on US stock market performing at an exceptional rate.

I wouldn't say that, but just that qwen 3 max thinking definitely underperforms relative to its size.

Qwen 3 max has been getting rather bad reviews around the web (both on reddit and chinese social media), and from my own experience with it. So I wouldn't expect this to be worse.

Apple chips are fastest in single core in most benchmarks, not just passmark.

What do you mean by imaginary patterns from Codeforces?

This kinda tracks with the latest estimate of power usage of llm inference published by google https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44972808. If inference isnt that power hungry like people thought, they must be able to make good money from those subscriptions.

In here https://blog.google/products/gemini/gemini-2-5-deep-think/, the professor google worked with also claimed proving some previously unproven conjecture.

It kinda is, at least I'd say a rich person is on average more intelligent than a poor person.

Looks like no more open source models :(

"We believe the benefits of superintelligence should be shared with the world as broadly as possible. That said, superintelligence will raise novel safety concerns. We'll need to be rigorous about mitigating these risks and careful about what we choose to open source. Still, we believe that building a free society requires that we aim to empower people as much as possible."

Looks like no more open source :(

We believe the benefits of superintelligence should be shared with the world as broadly as possible. That said, superintelligence will raise novel safety concerns. We'll need to be rigorous about mitigating these risks and careful about what we choose to open source. Still, we believe that building a free society requires that we aim to empower people as much as possible.

For the coding benchmarks, does anyone know what are OJBench and CFEval?

Is it time to send Matt Damon?

Yes, but with a 400B parameter model, at fp16 it's 800GB right? So with 800GB/s memory bandwidth, you'd still only be able to bring them in once per second.

Edit: actually forgot the MoE part, so that makes sense.

Interesting, so with enough memory bandwidth, even the server CPU has enough compute to do inference on a rather large model? Enough to compete against M4 gpu?

Edit: I just aked chatgpt and it says with no memory bandwidth bottleneck, i can still only achieve around 1 token/s from a 96 core cpu.

How? These don't even have GPU's right?

True, but openai definitely isn't trying to do public research on science, they are all about money now.

The proofs also seem more human reable than openai's?

I think this is them not being confident enough before the event, so they don't wanna be shown a worse result than competitors. By being private they can obviously not publish anything if it didn't work out.

"Note that I'm also an immigrant."

This sentence doesn't really help your statement, it just makes you a gatekeeper.

If you are seriously equating these two with AI, then you have horrible judgements and should learn to think critically, but unfortunately for you, I don't think critical thinking can be learned despite what people say.

Note that I'm not even going to bother arguing against your point and instead resort to personal attacks,because I believe it would be a waste of time to argue against people with poor judgment.

What I don't get is, education is one of US's big "exports", and basically easy money; so why try to kneecap that revenue stream?

I bet they did at one point in time, then they stopped doing that, but still not bug free.

Funny how as a Chinese, I told my Canadian friend that I'd bet on one of the Chinese companies catching up to Nvidia (at least partly) before AMD or Intel.

As opposed to bow down to Apple and oh, still can't make an iOS phone?