773 karma · joined June 11, 2021
https://twitter.com/sfstandard/status/1662145831351336977?s=...
https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/166044592518006374...
https://twitter.com/MattDevittWINK/status/750689348526432257...
https://openai.com/blog/new-ai-classifier-for-indicating-ai-...
Maybe the current state is optimal. Those talented people often go on to work in industry after all. But how to decide if it’s optimal?
BTW, to get crisp: she and similar others (I’m in this camp) support fair and equal treatment of minorities. What we oppose is the following (a common def of the form of wokeness they oppose). (1) assertion that any observed inequality is due to racism sexism etc (2) that we should fix this via racial or other quota systems.
We think (1) is obviously wrong and that (2) is highly unethical — Ie this particular ideology is rubbish and very harmful for our society.
Others disagree and they influence many of our institutions today. Maybe you think these axioms are cool, I don’t know. At any rate, There are people who do and in fact they are prevalent. Bari Weiss’s work (among other things now) catalogs examples of people who follow these principles and in this context argues why she and others find their principles wrong.
One hurts the full population. Is the liberal solution honestly any better for the addicts?
Amen. Some don’t agree though. They say we should favor historically mistreated groups because it’s important context. Yet, in higher ed this often entails favoring the child of doctors who will help diversity numbers over the poor white male.
I believe the culture wars would decrease dramatically if we’d drop the identity politics and simply say: let’s help the poor.
So he spent 0.1% of his wealth on this! Pretty reasonable budget to spend on something you enjoy IMHO.
He also put it to use on some exploratory missions, rescue mission etc.