716 karma · joined January 9, 2011
> "Drage was convicted of failing to disclose an encryption key in September." [1]
Though it says that he "failed" to disclose a password when asked. Not clear if he was unwilling or unable, and if such a distinction even matters. (It's unclear if the use of the term "refusal" was an actual action, or a journalistic spin. It might come down to needing to be very careful about word choice in such situations; "I would like to speak with my lawyer first" seems like the most appropriate answer).
That is, while one can prove that there is no physical key to a door on the person, there is no way to prove that one does not know the password.
How about tracking metrics other than just views? Following http://paulbutler.org/archives/experiment-in-testing-my-resu... there are: how far into resume one scrolls, clickthroughs on embedded links, inclusion/exclusion of sections (e.g. grades for recent grads).
Though obviously that is not very discreet. I wonder if "a very precise voltmeter" can fit inside of a non-suspicious looking USB device...
Although wouldn't Parallelism's multiple operations each be "in-flight"? That is, it's pretty clear that one can have concurrency without parallelism, but you seem to suggest that one can have parallelism without concurrency ("deterministic parallelism"). Which doesn't _sound_ right... Even with MapReduce, the order in which tasks are complete are not deterministic (different hardware, network latency, etc), so I don't see how you could determine in which order mappers are passed on to reducers.
So kind of like http://www.gigpark.com/ (which is arguably something like "Yelp for (Business and other types of) Services").
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110303/ap_on_re_us/us_gps_track...
> the agents who showed up to collect the device were "hostile," threatening to charge Afifi if he didn't immediately cooperate and refusing his request to have a lawyer present.
Overall I was pleased with their HR, although it was odd that there was only one SDE phone interview (as oppose to typical pair of phone interviews that Amazon and Google has).
Message received from 858-XXX-XXXX at Sun Apr 10 2011 21:59:46 GMT+0000 (UTC)
What nonsense do you speak of? The humanity!
Reply received from 724-XXX-XXXX at Sun Apr 10 2011 22:28:29 GMT+0000 (UTC)
8========================D