Areas near airports would be fast to reach, but onward travel from the airports wouldn't be so much faster than 100 years ago.
And the oceans would look different - it still takes a long time to reach the mid-atlantic!
1,776 karma · joined September 13, 2010
Areas near airports would be fast to reach, but onward travel from the airports wouldn't be so much faster than 100 years ago.
And the oceans would look different - it still takes a long time to reach the mid-atlantic!
Big corporate places can completely restrict things and prevent any traffic from internal hosts to the internet. You can use proxying for web browsing etc. and then monitor that to check for any unauthorised traffic.
But it's easy to see why the commercial companies haven't produced this yet. If a bug in this means you get too much insulin then you'll end up passing out and it could kill you within a really short length of time.
I spoke to one of my doctors about it and he seemed slightly scared at what these people are trying. There have been doctors researching this for years in carefully controlled trials, and now there are hundreds of people just plugging together phones and trying it out for themselves.
I don't think this is a problem for the intended audience - developers and test sites.
But there should perhaps be a clear warning somewhere about not using this in production.
EDIT: Turns out this is actually mentioned on the FAQ page of https://sslip.io/
But do they have any other freemium services like the personal/family tiers of OpenDNS? I can't think of any.
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&url=http://www.w...
I believe that many of them are actually single-use. Some (or perhaps all?) of the Crossrail TBMs are being buried at the end of their tunnel. Apparently the effort of removing them isn't worth their resale value?
That tunnel talk page does mention that several TBMs are being reused though so perhaps this is changing with newer/larger machines.
There will apparently be an ARM version of Windows 10 for the pi, but that's a cut down version for internet of things type apps.
You can emulate x86 on ARM with something like QEMU. But the performance wouldn't be good enough for any modern OS.
In short, if I'm understanding correctly:
$0.01 per GB per month storage
$0.01 per GB retrieval
Normal egress fees on top, so additional ~$0.10 per GB if you want to retrieve outside of Google Cloud.
Early deletion fee. Effectively just a minimum storage charge of 1 month.
It seems this is cheaper than Glacier and quite a bit simpler. The speed restrictions are interesting though.This article is in response to the recent Oxfam report which talked about the wealth of the global 1%. So in that context the absolute wealth, in the way that Oxfam measured it, is relevant.
Although there has been a huge amount of inflation since then you'd expect that the interest payments have more than made up for this.
I guess that IBM are planning to use this as a framework to build custom apps on. And the publicity from this announcement is supposed to help them get more companies asking them for apps.
It's clear that if the UK have evidence of someone breaking the law then there are options available. What they're complaining about are suspects who are just being monitored as "suspicious".
But even if they'd wanted to ask e.g. Yahoo to monitor the suspects, I can't see how that would have operated. Obviously UK ISPs can identify and monitor specific people (or at least their home/mobile internet). But remote services can't tie things back to an individual[2].
Really they seem to be suggesting that anyone running a large internet service proactively monitor everything for "terrorism" and notify the relevant international authorities when this happens. From the report:
We note that several of the companies ascribed their failure to review suspicious content to the volume of material on their systems. Whilst there may be practical difficulties involved, the companies should accept they have a responsibility to notify the relevant authorities when an automatic trigger indicating terrorism is activated and allow the authorities, whether US or UK, to take the next step. We further note that several of the companies attributed the lack of monitoring to the need to protect their users’ privacy. However, where there is a possibility that a terrorist atrocity is being planned, that argument should not be allowed to prevail.
I find it hard to believe that anyone technical is suggesting this!
The MPs on the committee might not understand how impractical it is but what about the people from GCHQ who were suggesting this? Either they seriously think this is a good ide, or they're just trying to get more ammunition for increased monitoring powers within the UK.
[1] https://b1cba9b3-a-5e6631fd-s-sites.googlegroups.com/a/indep...
[2] I suppose they could use the IP address, if GCHQ did the cross referencing for changing NAT etc. But that would be impractical for some ISPs where the IP changes regularly.
This is basically the latest version of Lotus Notes. The UI might not be great, but anything is an improvement over the old versions.
IBM still have a large number of corporate customers on Notes/Domino and they've been talking for a while about how to integrate email with other "social" apps for file sharing etc.
This is obviously server-based and so means e-mail without the Notes client, but I believe that it's still built on a Domino server underneath.
XP was the newest possible version of Windows as recently as 2007, and since most people ignored Vista it was the default install for many (most?) people up until Windows 7, which was only 5 years ago. SP3 came out in 2008 and significantly improved the features and security.
Combined with some odd licenses and old PC stock in stores there were plenty of people buying new laptops in 2010 with XP installed.
Yes, it's old. But more like 5-6 years than 13.
Their description suggests that it's just using a blacklist of MAC addresses so it would be pretty easy to add to something like OpenWRT or a captive portal.
I found that I can pick up a lot of planes even with the stubby antenna that came with the DVB stick. But I'm pretty close to the Heathrow flight path which gives me a slight advantage!
The dump1090 process uses 30-40% CPU on my pi so I start it up with nice -n+19. And it does seem to crash quite often so I've got something to check and restart it.
I guess that at many places you'd just buy datacenter edition, but that's a bit too much for small businesses.
RC4 is mentioned in passing as having weaknesses, but is it actually broken? If we can't disable SSL3 completely would using only RC4 ciphers be an option?
I was curious as well. Elsewhere the article says it's not vulnerable:
...a zero-day vulnerability impacting all supported versions of Microsoft Windows (XP is not impacted)
Are there any significant Windows vulnerabilities for XP since the EOL? I was waiting for the first one that isn't patched, will be interesting to see how the bad guys use it.
Out of interest - are those two letters the start of a password from any other site?
Presumably the leak came from a third party site so it would be your password from there rather than your gmail password.