- https://github.com/status-im/nwaku
- https://github.com/status-im/nimbus-eth2
But I think the real killer feature to me is the javascript target. It seems like a real dream for a fullstack experience.
1,586 karma · joined April 8, 2019
- https://github.com/status-im/nwaku
- https://github.com/status-im/nimbus-eth2
But I think the real killer feature to me is the javascript target. It seems like a real dream for a fullstack experience.
I would swing $4 if they added encrypted DMs.
You mean the accuracy of the data? I guess that is why a lot of systems have “validators” or something like that in place.
But it’s a problem with OSM and wikipedia in general.
They could even make an app to submit the improvements and even show me ads, I don't care. I would still do it.
With real life friends, people naturally self censor quite a lot.
But if you do want an IRL friend network, also consider a “friend” system. Because I don’t think fully public posts jives with your idea. If I just want to talk to friends, I don’t want to share with the world.
> Private responses.
> Private subscriber counts.
> No status games. No trolls. No pressure.
This is the real differentiator. Do you still use algorithms around likes and follows to recommend users to each other and such?
Those data points actually are useful to get people more connected to the network and help them find their community
If email was better designed, it would not allow these situations to happen. For example, if server operators didn't own your account, there would be no problem.
It is a protocol issue.
Only solution is something like how Farcaster does it where you at least get to keep your public key the same and usernames are optional.
https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol#3-identity
Or go the urbit route and make the addresses totally user owned.
I wish more apps used this tech.
https://support.argent.xyz/hc/en-us/articles/360022631992-Ab...
Then they got rid of it and replaced it with… nothing?
To be fair, that is the fault of most programming textbooks and courses.
Maybe ONE programming course (Learn Go With Test) I’ve seen has focused on this.
That would be amazing and it is the one major thing missing from other options like Statamic.
Nobody understood my needs around this when I was looking for solutions.
It’s the best way I’ve found to send money to strangers on the internet. I’ve opened unofficial bounties and paid open source developers to implement them, as one example.
It really “just works” in a way where other crypto currency doesn’t.
I still support many other projects in this space, but Monero was the only one I felt comfortable actually using.
There might be, but I can’t see it on mobile
If I could choose which endorsement agency to trust and then drop them for a competitor if they break my trust. Not bad.
Maybe 2 minutes for the technical side, then 2 months of getting all your old followers to follow you at your new address.
> if you want more, use the IM of your trust ;)
Or use a different protocol...
Much of the Kanji even means the same thing in Chinese (different pronunciations of course though).
Now you have to ask why that is, right? My guess would be the law & order mentality of the state.
The proof is all around us. People don’t want to use services run by their friends. Otherwise they would.
I trust my brother with my life, but I would prefer to use Instagram DMs rather than a chat service he is running on a VPS. There is so much that can go wrong with a service like that. No offense to him, but I’d rather a company handle it where people are getting paid to do it.
Generally speaking, if someone is running a service out of the goodness of their heart, they are doing it as a hobby. And you have to wonder why it is so fun to them? They enjoy handling peoples’ chats? Seems a lil weird. I love my brother, but just seems a little off.
People do think like this.
There is terms and service, legal systems etc for corporations. There is no such thing for individual server admins. They are right to feel weird about their friend running their private chats as opposed to a company.
A lot of people here dismissed me, didn't believe me, or just said that I shouldn't care.
I can't help but think that the Firefox "community" is just kinda like that. They don't really care about things that regular users are bothered by.
Culture dictates priorities, right?