How is this a sustainable product/company? (AKA How do you make money?)
Is love to dig in to what looks like an awesome product. But to justify the time investment, it would be helpful to know how it will be around long term.
710 karma · joined January 13, 2012
Previously co-Founder of data analytics firm, Edge Solutions.
https://twitter.com/nwenzel
How is this a sustainable product/company? (AKA How do you make money?)
Is love to dig in to what looks like an awesome product. But to justify the time investment, it would be helpful to know how it will be around long term.
[0]We're 18 people, enterprise SaaS, started by 2 founders who have worked together for 15 years. https://www.simplelegal.com/careers
Also looking for Head of Engineering and devs (senior front end dev, lead API dev, Django dev).
Having worked as a contractor, I've seen that number typically between 33% and 50%. Staff Augmentation is a horrible, horrible business. The firms also end up stuffing the hiring managers inbox with a bunch of resumes of unqualified candidates to box out other competing firms. No one wins except the abusers of what could be a positive program.
I'm the CEO and co-founder of SimpleLegal. We're enterprise SaaS for the Legal Department from the YC13 batch.
Sales has Salesforce. Marketing Has Hubspot/Marketo. Customer Success has Gainsight. Legal has SimpleLegal. We're a team of 16 and growing with a great list of customers.
Director of Customer Success - Lead the Support and CS team. Hire ahead of need. CS drives growth. You'll drive CS. https://www.simplelegal.com/careers/customer-success-directo...
SDR/BDR - Spend the first 1-3 months in support to learn about our customers and product. Then move into an outbound role to help us build our customer base. https://www.simplelegal.com/careers/sales-development-rep
Product Manager - Help manage the growth of our product between Developers, Customer Success, and Sales. (Not yet posted.)
Check the postings for more info, then email our careers inbox at SimpleLegal.com.
Disclaimer: I have nothing to do with CaseText but I do know the CEO as a result of being a legal operations software CEO and being in YC with them.
SimpleLegal is the dashboard for in-house legal departments. Salesforce -> Sales Ops. SimpleLegal -> Legal Ops.
We're looking for the right person to fill a varied role that supports our customers and our internal team. A QA Engineer looking to move into a more diversified role might be a good fit.
The right person is:
- Pretty Darn Good with Excel
- Experienced with scripting languages like Python or JavaScript
Day to Day Responsibilities
- Hands-on fixing data issues from customers
- Help build an internal application health dashboard
- Collaborate with developers to define application enhancements
About You
You get things done. You know when to automate and when to use brute force. You are detail oriented. You probably are an expert with Excel. You are technical enough to write short scripts. You definitely know some SQL.
You should want to genuinely help our customers. No one can succeed long-term in enterprise software without a genuine desire to make their customers' days better.
Email us at careers at simplelegal.com.
Seems like discussion on homelessness would be slightly easier if we started from first principles or at least some place where there is closer to a consensus.
SimpleLegal (https://www.simplelegal.com) is enterprise SaaS for in-house legal departments. We keep legal vendors, matters, and expenses organized. We're Salesforce for the Legal Dept. We're pre-Series A because our customers fund our growth by paying us.
ROLES:
- Senior Customer Support
- Implementation Manager
- Front-End Engineer
If you're interested, send me an email. It's my HN username at SimpleLegal.com.
* SENIOR CUSTOMER SUPPORT *
We are looking to fill a Senior Customer Support role. This person will work with our customers as well as with law firms to ensure that they are happy customers who refer us to more happy customers.
Bonus points if you're currently a paralegal or on the billing team at a law firm.
* IMPLEMENTATION MANAGER *
You're comfortable working with messy data. You might be an Excel guru or maybe you even write some basic scripts.
You have excellent project management skills and can track multiple stakeholders and multiple deadlines.
* FRONT-END DEVELOPER *
You believe that enterprise software can be great. You want to build software that people use every single day.
- Has a strong interest and at least some ability in designing and implementing great, consistent UX/UI.
- Comfortable with pushing us toward a single front-end framework
- Comfortable with a Django, Postgres, Redis, JQuery, and a mix of other JS libraries stack
- Experience working with older versions of popular frameworks (e.g. Bootstrap)
And yes, software makers exaggerate in their advertising.
As compared to the author's other posts, this one seems hurried and maybe a little grumpy. But, still makes an important point.
Seems like that would hold true to its original purpose of not taxing someone out of their home, make investment in property somewhat less appealing, and provide a more predictable funding source for schools.
How can you (or we) ensure your FOIA request for code isn't responded to with a PDF of code?
Also, you have to figure some of that money is going to early employees and investors who are looking to take a little off the table.
BTW - check out www.casetext.com for an idea of what private enterprise can do in terms of making public records useful.
Or maybe the growth of these super-angel funds means "only" money isn't enough to get direct access to deals. "Only" money means you're going to pay the toll/carry. But money + advice/connections/intros/brand is your ticket to direct participation.
At a time when startups can start with relatively low capital requirements, the "strategic" part of "strategic investor" would seem to be the valuable part.
But, I wouldn't worry too much about angels getting cut out entirely. If "their margin is [your] opportunity" (Jeff Bezos), then founders should be able to get better terms from a direct angel investment. Or, maybe more accurately, an angel investing directly should be willing to pay a higher price given that there is no carry.
Also, their software is actually really helpful at thinking through ideas. I don't mean to knock them. But the title is wrong and takes away from their achievement.
1) SDR - Sales Development Rep -- $60k OTE
2) Marketing / Demand Gen -- $80k + bonus
About SimpleLegal:
SimpleLegal is enterprise SaaS for in-house legal departments. We are a YC-backed startup with founders who had previously bootstrapped a business for 10 years. Customers love our product so much they refer us to their colleagues before they've even fully deployed.
1) SDR - Sales Development Rep -- $60k OTE
- Execute on Outbound lead gen strategy
- Prospect for new leads via referrals, outbound, landing pages, SEO
- Meet or Exceed monthly targets for Sales Qualified Leads
We have product-market fit and a sales playbook to turn prospects into leads into customers.
2) Marketing / Demand Gen -- $80k OTE
- Increase Qualified Leads
- Plan, lead, and execute all marketing strategies
- Measure and report on performance of all marketing efforts
- 2 years experience in marketing/lead generation role
If you're looking for more responsibility and autonomy than you have at your current marketing role, we want to talk to you.
Your idea about building, then destroying a company is intriguing. But it would really suck to hurt those people. Or my customers who count on the great work those people do.
I like to think I'm not a sociopath. Posting on HN is probably not a great way to be told what you want to hear. :)
But yes, I do encounter some disbelief that I am asking a real question and am hoping for a real answer.
I'm certainly curious what the community thinks is the right way to discuss a candidate's career after this job. We all know there will be a job after this job and an employee after this employee. Transparency... something that seems to be valued by people on this forum... would seem to require that we talk about it.
As far as the learning part, I didn't mean to restrict "learning" to only mean coding/programming/developing. At a smaller company, if there's something you want to do, you often have more freedom to take it on. There's very little "not my job" allowed or "not your job" enforced.
I realize there are several counter-examples of sociopathic micro-managing, ultra-secretive founders out there. Avoid those people whether at a big company or a small company.
At any rate, if you prefer larger companies, I think it's awesome that you know that. When I interview candidates, I always try to help them figure out their preference. It's not always easy for that person to know. Sometimes their desire for "a" job or a "new" job makes it hard for them to figure out if they want "this" job.
In any case, sorry for making a blanket statement about lack of learning at larger companies. I unintentionally commented on all large companies based only on my own experiences with large companies.
As far as what I want to hear... I don't have some "right" answer in mind. The question also helps me understand the person a little better than a typical interview question might. If I know their long-term goals, I can have a better idea if they'll be happy with us and we'll be happy with them.
It's a weird question. But it's how I know whether or not I can deliver value to that potential employee. At big companies, salary and benefits is usually the main "value" that they provide. So, in essence, they provide the higher comp package necessary to make up for the fact that an employee is not going to learn as much as they would at a smaller company. A small company or an early stage startup is full of opportunities to learn. If your goal is to start your own company someday, I can make sure you're leaning the things that will help you get there. If you want to be a race car driver, I don't have much for you.
Employment is a two-way agreement. It's true that employers have the upper hand because they typically represent 100% of that person's income. The employee, on the other hand, is 1/N of the workforce. Switching costs are also likely higher for the employee.
For many people, I would imagine that a transparent and honest assessment is preferred to a pretend make-believe world where we imagine that an employee will spend their entire career in one place.
Command-and-control does have some advantages. And maybe as Postgres grows, the advantages related to a more orderly process become more visible. (For the record, I think Postgres is a fantastic RDBMS + JSON store)