Define "wins". From what happening right now, it seems that google may lose much more than it earned by aligning with seo spammers
Maybe they need to start locking employee stock options for 100 years to prevent them optimizing short-term gains?
460 karma · joined April 22, 2016
Define "wins". From what happening right now, it seems that google may lose much more than it earned by aligning with seo spammers
Maybe they need to start locking employee stock options for 100 years to prevent them optimizing short-term gains?
Sometimes dumb, bruteforce and biased solution can work way better than any automation you can come up with
That's proper level of security, when people don't even suspect someone using messenger to buy drugs
Totally agree, both should be absolutely legal and accepted
No, that really justifies anything. Programs should be pleasant for users to use, not for developers to work on them
When signal becomes at least remotely as popular as telegram it will implement same protection to fight against spammers because you can't have free unrestricted registrations and don't drown in spam
Telegram currently makes it as accessible as possible: either use it freely but register using phone number and official app or pay and use anonymously as you want
Thing is, reading code is way faster than writing code
>very offensive
Any cons?
I guess they are not letting to use email because they will instantly be overrun by bots
You can disable discovery by phone number as well
>Then there is a massive issue of privacy, which allows strangers to look up your number and use it for spam and fraud.
They have info that this phone number exists and nothing else. Ok, also that the user uses telegram. Not much. This info can be reasonably used for spam with lots of numbers, not 150/month
Also I already trust sms to the centralized greedy third party usually acting against my interests called mobile phone operator. Now this also includes some random person and it suddenly becomes "privacy nightmare"
Disable contact sync, you don't need it for telegram to work
> Another dimension of privacy is I might want to read a message without knowing the sender read it. You may or may not care about that.
Long press on chat
> Then they’ll have the history and you won’t
You have a button to "nuke" chat for both of you from server. Then they'll have no proof except their words that "I didn't make this up, I honestly exported chat". Honestly, I don't really get this point. Can you elaborate a bit? What is the problem with exporting?
> If you want to sell drugs and remain private, Telegram might be less likely to report you to the government.
And with telegram you can register anonymous "number" on blockchain via tor and don't even care about telegram reporting you to the government. Is this intended to be bad point for telegram?
> threat model suited for the average person is much more unfavorable on Telegram than on Discord
Discord have TOS that allows it to read your private chats and ban you for privately discussing things that are against their code of conduct. This makes any sentence with words "discord" and "private" a complete joke. It's non-private messenger that never even pretended to be private. Maybe somewhat private if your main threat are random internet trolls
Sorry, what?