notyourwork

Because the article said so? That’s your rationale for saying the executive branch isn’t weaponizing the rest of government offices for their own influence and benefit. Sorry, color me unconvinced until this administration shows good faith.

Probably less about tax revenue and more about the executive branch squeezing tech companies to assert influence.

Generally I agree up until now where we appear to be treading on the threshold of AI being orders of magnitude more powerful. Given that, which has potential to displace large swaths of the labor force, I feel as though society deserves a larger return on investment.

Anyone remember when the discussions about classifying the internet as a utility and Akit’s stupid Reese cup coffee mug. It feels so long ago given how much has transpired since.

The display has some bearing on this. Generally, 1080p is good enough but some cinematography benefits from better resolution and as a result, requires a better display.

Those are obvious. Sorry but I was interested in more nuance given the article.

Sadly people don’t have to remember. They have to be proven guilty.

Nah, with this administration I don’t believe a lack of impropriety without proof. It’s swampy all the way down.

Curious from you or others when FaaS isn’t possible? What criteria do you look for to decide or migrate off?

Based on what? Why is one more affordable over another? Substantiating your claim would provide a better discussion.

Advertisements can be ironic, I don’t think marketing is the foundation I use to decide about a companies integrity.

Paper money and if they are like any other startup, most of that paper wealth is concentrated to the top very few.

Is a face scan accurate enough to do that with 100% accuracy?

Ding ding ding. Matter of time, this is merely damage control until the news cycle fades into the next.

Agreed. Some threads make the suggestion you replied to and seemingly fail to ignore the reality of business. Not all businesses want to insource all problems.

That didn’t by accident though.

Do as I say, not as I do. It’s a standard operating model for hypocrites.

Yes, my statement was related to legal means. I’m not a lawyer.

Reminded me of big balls and DOGE. Didn’t we vibe code our entire government by now?

I didn’t read the comment you replied to in that way. I read it as, edge cases can be gnarly and the most thorough of documentation and process will never capture them all.

It’s just the truth, tribal knowledge comes from experience in the trenches and what a new hire could take weeks to discern from perfect documentation and old timer may know off the cuff.

That’s the reality of enterprise software. Especially in big tech where scale is massive and theoretical solutions aren’t always the best choice for “reasons”.

I don't get why I can be forced to use my biometrics to unlock but I cannot be forced to give a pin. Doesn't jive in my brain.

You really think ads in vehicle are not coming? You’re being naive if you think that.

Also, cheap rides cut into stocks margins. That won’t fly by investors either. These companies are not charities. They are in the business of maximizing profits. We lost “don’t be evil” over a decade ago.

This reply also falls in the category. It’s easier and faster to downvote poor responses and move on.

Both. Internal are customers too.

Cringey to watch their interviews.

Corp or total? Amazon employees a lot of labor for fulfillment centers and other labor jobs.

Really dismissive and ignorant take from a bystander. Back it up with your delivery that does better instead of shouting with a pitchfork for no reason.

I didn't imply anything about what big-tech would do.

Why should it not react heavily? What’s stopping this from being a start of a trend for google and even Amazon?

I assume the reference was AI use cases are not profitable. Those companies are subsidizing and OpenAI/grok are burning money.